Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 221 - 240 of 246
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39501
TRAJKOVSKI AND CHIPOVSKI v. North Macedonia
TRAJKOVSKI AND CHIPOVSKI v. North Macedonia MKD 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: This case concerns an unjustified interference with the applicants right to respect for their private life due the indefinite retention of their DNA EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55579
TRAPANI v. Italy
TRAPANI v. Italy ITA 12/01/2001 00:00:00 16/11/2016 16:06:29 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and 8 in the case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39202
TUS AND OTHERS v. Turkey
TUS AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 19/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of the applicants detention in police custody the lack of an effective remedy and the absence of a right to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30690
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
ULKE v. Turkey
ULKE v. Turkey TUR 24/04/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants repetitive prosecutions and convictions for refusing to carry out compulsory military service as pacifists and conscientious objectors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37268
UMMUHAN KAPLAN v. Turkey
UMMUHAN KAPLAN v. Turkey TUR 20/06/2012 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Lengthy judicial proceedings: excessive length of proceedings before administrative civil criminal labour land registry military and commercial and consumers courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5646
UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. Austria
UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. Austria AUT 26/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-819
URBONAVICIUS v. Lithuania
URBONAVICIUS v. Lithuania LTU 21/05/2019 00:00:00 28/05/2019 14:50:56 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of Kaunas Remand Prison to allow the applicant an apnea medical device violation of Article 3 . Status of Execution: an action report EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52112
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to take operational measures in line with international standards to protect two minors who were prosecuted in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58063
VARDANYAN AND NANUSHYAN v. Armenia
VARDANYAN AND NANUSHYAN v. Armenia ARM 06/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice and protection of property: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty due to the quashing of a final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46285
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
VASSILIOS ATHANASIOU AND OTHERS v. Greece
VASSILIOS ATHANASIOU AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 21/03/2011 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:42:24 Case Description: Administrative proceedings: structural problem of excessive length of administrative proceedings before the administrative courts and the Council of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22916
VEKONY v. Hungary
VEKONY v. Hungary HUN 01/06/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to protection of property due to the circumstances in which their tobacco retail licences were removed and not re granted as a consequence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10973
VENEMA v. the Netherlands
VENEMA v. the Netherlands NLD 17/03/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unjustified failure to allow parents to participate in the decision making process having led to a provisional placement of their daughter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4375
VISTINS AND PEREPJOLKINS v. Latvia
VISTINS AND PEREPJOLKINS v. Latvia LVA 25/10/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Interference with property rights: Extreme disproportion between the official cadastral value of the land and the actual compensation received for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31102
VLADIMIR KHARITONOV v. Russia
VLADIMIR KHARITONOV v. Russia RUS 16/11/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: The Vladimir Kharitonov group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression Article 10 on account of different types of blocking EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56325
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine UKR 11/07/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Vyerentsov group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to freedom of assembly violation of Article 11 . The Vyerentsov case concerns violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31279
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984