Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 181 - 200 of 270
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
NISIOTIS v. Greece
NISIOTIS v. Greece GRC 20/06/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and/or degrading treatment of the applicants on account of the poor conditions of detention of the applicants in overcrowded prisons in Greece EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15760
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Structural problem highlighted by the Court applying the pilot judgment procedure: violations of the applicants right of access to a court and right to peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7092
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
OLIMP PRODUCERS' COOPERATIVE v. Armenia
OLIMP PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE v. Armenia ARM 30/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive length of administrative proceedings. The European Court could not find any fact or argument capable of justifying the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55741
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 09/04/2018 00:00:00 19/07/2018 11:30:51 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicant associations right to freedom of association on account of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49857
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: In the present case the Court found violations of Articles 5 1 and 8 of the Convention on account of the extra legal transfer of all five applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52803
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PEDICINI v. Italy
PEDICINI v. Italy ITA 10/06/2009 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Unjustified interference with private life due to the application of limitations to the applicant s personal capacity deriving from being registered as bankrupt and lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44531
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PIHONI v. Albania
PIHONI v. Albania ALB 13/05/2018 00:00:00 13/06/2018 16:15:19 Case Description: The case concerns allegations of excessive use of force by the police and failure to conduct an effective investigation into the incident an altercation between the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49563
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to introduce remedies that would provide the applicants with a reasonable opportunity to challenge the Bank of Slovenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59299
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland POL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Since 1987 the applicants have been prevented from developing their plot of land following a decision to classify it as a historic monument on the grounds that a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20604