Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 108
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/12/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern discrimination against the applicants on account of their ineligibility to stand for election to the Presidency of Bosnia and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3141
SHANNON v. Latvia
SHANNON v. Latvia LVA 24/02/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure by a regional court to examine promptly appeals against the extension of remand in custody. Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31183
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns the demolition in 2013 of a building in an Albanian coastal town in which the applicants owned flats and business premises in disregard of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49665
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece GRC 25/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: These cases concern ill treatment by law enforcement agents substantive violation of Article 3 in Konstantinopoulos and Others No. 2 and the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49397
SINGH v. the Czech Republic
SINGH v. the Czech Republic CZE 25/04/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness and excessive length of the applicants detention with a view to deportation and a lack of prompt examination of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6080
SMATANA v. the Czech Republic
SMATANA v. the Czech Republic CZE 31/03/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unjustified prolongation of detention lack of speedy revision in appeal proceedings insufficient certainty concerning the right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6294
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia SRB 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the ineffective investigations into the allegations of ill treatment by police officers procedural violations of Article 3 ill treatment by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7310
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania ALB 21/05/2020 00:00:00 18/08/2020 10:08:56 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant a person suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was found not criminally liable for attempted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55687
SULAOJA v. Estonia
SULAOJA v. Estonia EST 15/05/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unjustified extension of the applicants detention on remand and the failure to examine their applications for release promptly. Article 5 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3063
SYKORA v. the Czech Republic
SYKORA v. the Czech Republic CZE 22/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Unlawful detention in a psychiatric hospital of a person deprived of legal capacity: lack of safeguards against arbitrariness and judicial review of the detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6400
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice / Protection of private life: Failure to protect the applicants from private activities producing a dangerous effects EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37302
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to take operational measures in line with international standards to protect two minors who were prosecuted in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58063
V.C. v. Italy
V.C. v. Italy ITA 01/05/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to take promptly and then effectively all reasonable measures to protect the applicant a child suffering from alcohol and drug addiction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49459
VASILAKIS v. Greece
VASILAKIS v. Greece GRC 17/04/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to civil courts decisions by which they were ordered to pay damages for defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15593
VASSIS AND OTHERS v. France
VASSIS AND OTHERS v. France FRA 27/09/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:58:31 Case Description: Unjustified interference with the right to individual liberty due to lack of judicial supervision of detention and breach of the right to be brought promptly before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33399