Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 601 - 620 of 869
PETKOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
PETKOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 05/06/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court by the rejection of a cooperative members claim due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6480
PETYO PETKOV v. Bulgaria
PETYO PETKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/04/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and protection of rights in detention as functioning of justice and protection of property: Obligation of a detainee to wear a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1905
PFLEGER v. Austria
PFLEGER v. Austria AUT 04/07/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing and of a public delivery of the decisions in land consolidation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-813
PIALOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece (no. 2)
PIALOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece no. 2 GRC 07/12/2017 00:00:00 16/01/2018 11:15:06 Case Description: Protection of property rights / functioning of justice / effective remedy: Authorities failure to settle the status of the applicants properties in terms EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48741
PICHKUR v. Ukraine
PICHKUR v. Ukraine UKR 07/02/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:31:54 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to property rights: Entitlement to the pension dependent on the retired person s place of residence resulting in the applicant s deprivation of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15011
PINCOVA AND PINC v. the Czech Republic
PINCOVA AND PINC v. the Czech Republic CZE 05/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the restitution to its former owner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6060
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to introduce remedies that would provide the applicants with a reasonable opportunity to challenge the Bank of Slovenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59299
PIRON v. France
PIRON v. France FRA 14/02/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Excessive length of proceedings concerning the consolidation of parcels of land and thus interference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33107
PITTINI v. Italy
PITTINI v. Italy ITA 18/07/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42905
PLAKHTEYEV AND PLAKHTEYEVA v. Ukraine
PLAKHTEYEV AND PLAKHTEYEVA v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of property rights and functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court to claim damages for a wrongful fine and the unjustified seizure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31124
PLATAKOU v. Greece
PLATAKOU v. Greece GRC 06/09/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of access to a court erroneous dismissal of an application for compensation for expropriated EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22174
PLESHKOV v. Romania
PLESHKOV v. Romania ROU 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:35:07 Case Description: No punishment without law and protection of property: Criminal conviction as well as forfeiture of property used for the commission of the alleged offense under a legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17622
POLANSCY v. Poland
POLANSCY v. Poland POL 07/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Unlawful delay in payment of due compensation following expropriation on the basis of allegedly lacking financial resources. Status of Execution: Deadlines for an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39863
POLIMERKONTEYNER, TOV v. Ukraine
POLIMERKONTEYNER TOV v. Ukraine UKR 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Arbitrary and disproportionate interference on account of the repeated application of a wrong tariff classification code to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46275
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
PONOMARENKO v. Ukraine
PONOMARENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/09/2007 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of justice due to the unjustified refusal by the domestic courts to consider the applicant s claim against local EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26164
PONOMARYOV v. Ukraine
PONOMARYOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/09/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Breach of the legal certainty principle resulting from the unjustified extension of the time limits for appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31358
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2)
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova no. 2 MDA 06/03/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concern the violation of the applicants right to a fair hearing on account of the quashing of domestic final judgments between 2004 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6810
POSTI AND RAHKO v. Finland
POSTI AND RAHKO v. Finland FIN 21/05/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court to contest restrictions on fishing imposed by administrative regulations. Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4802
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland POL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Since 1987 the applicants have been prevented from developing their plot of land following a decision to classify it as a historic monument on the grounds that a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20604