Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 301 - 320 of 329
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
ULARIU v. Romania
ULARIU v. Romania ROU 24/03/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 13:53:03 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: no EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15799
ULKE v. Turkey
ULKE v. Turkey TUR 24/04/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants repetitive prosecutions and convictions for refusing to carry out compulsory military service as pacifists and conscientious objectors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37268
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to take operational measures in line with international standards to protect two minors who were prosecuted in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58063
V.D. v. Romania
V.D. v. Romania ROU 28/06/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inhuman and degrading treatment in prison due to the failure to provide a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13083
VARGA v. Romania
VARGA v. Romania ROU 01/07/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / protection of home: Unlawfulness of the applicants detention on remand after committal for trial and the expiry of the prosecutor s order EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16217
VASARAB AND PAULUS v. Slovakia
VASARAB AND PAULUS v. Slovakia SVK 15/03/2023 00:00:00 27/03/2023 08:53:55 Case Description: The case concerns overall unfairness of criminal proceedings in 2010 2019 on account of the domestic courts refusal without sufficient reasons of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62935
VASIL HRISTOV v. Bulgaria
VASIL HRISTOV v. Bulgaria BGR 16/09/2015 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Failure of authorities to identify and punish private parties responsible for a violent attack against the applicant resulting in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3957
VASILEVA v. Denmark
VASILEVA v. Denmark DNK 25/12/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:02:09 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Disproportionate arrest and detention at a police station for travelling on a bus without valid ticket without taking particular account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3281
VASILIAUSKAS v. Lithuania
VASILIAUSKAS v. Lithuania LTU 20/10/2015 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: No punishment without law: Conviction for genocide for having participated as an operational agent of the Ministry of State Security of the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4330
VASILICIUC v. the Republic of Moldova
VASILICIUC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 02/08/2017 00:00:00 25/10/2017 10:22:51 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention abroad on the basis of an international arrest warrant issued by Interpol at the request of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48057
VAUDELLE v. France
VAUDELLE v. France FRA 05/09/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings in which the applicant placed under legal protection was convicted in absentia to imprisonment and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33099
VEIZI AND DEDA v. Albania
VEIZI AND DEDA v. Albania ALB 28/03/2017 00:00:00 05/05/2017 14:57:15 Case Description: Friendly settlement: This case concerns complaints under Articles 2 6 and 13 related to the effectiveness of the investigation into the death of the applicants family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46785
VETTER v. France
VETTER v. France FRA 31/08/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the use of listening devices in the apartment of a third party EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33215
VLASENKO v. Ukraine
VLASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2022 00:00:00 04/02/2022 11:30:26 Case Description: The case concerns the prosecution authorities temporary access to the applicant s banking documents ordered in an arbitrary manner in January 2013 in the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59581
VOLODINA v. Russia
VOLODINA v. Russia RUS 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54227
VOLODINA v. Russia (no. 2)
VOLODINA v. Russia no. 2 RUS 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59319
WATSON v. France
WATSON v. France FRA 16/09/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the use of listening devices in the apartment of a third party EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33007
WESOLEK v. Poland
WESOLEK v. Poland POL 13/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court on account of the refusal of the applicant s request for full exemption from court fees to challenge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52320
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459