Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 60 of 601
AVCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AVCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 27/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in detention: ill treatment on account of disproportionate restraint measures taken to prevent detainees from absconding during their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37409
AVETISYAN v. Armenia
AVETISYAN v. Armenia ARM 10/02/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 11:52:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to restriction of the right to examine witnesses whose testimony played a decisive role in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46121
AVILKINA AND OTHERS v. Russia
AVILKINA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 07/10/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the right to private life of the second and fourth applicants neither suspect nor accused in any investigation on account of the disclosure of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14016
AYCAGUER v. France
AYCAGUER v. France FRA 22/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the applicant s refusal in the context of a criminal sanction to comply with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47815
AYDIN TATLAV v. Turkey
AYDIN TATLAV v. Turkey TUR 02/08/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to a conviction to one year s imprisonment converted into a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-29223
AYDIN v. Turkey
AYDIN v. Turkey TUR 16/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of an effective remedy to challenge the lawfulness of detention on account of the non communication of the public prosecutor s opinion. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47011
B.S. v. Spain
B.S. v. Spain ESP 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and discrimination: Lack of effective investigation into allegations of racially motivated ill treatment inflicted by police agents. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5760
BAGLAR v. Turkey
BAGLAR v. Turkey TUR 10/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Non communication of the public prosecutor s opinion to the applicant or his representative in the context of review proceedings of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47947
BAJIC v. North Macedonia
BAJIC v. North Macedonia MKD 10/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to the failure of the Supreme Court to communicate to the applicant the public prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58423
BAKANOVA v. Lithuania
BAKANOVA v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigations into the death of the applicant s husband in 2007 on board of a ship off the coast of Brazil. Article 2 procedural limb EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4367
BALAJEVS v. Latvia
BALAJEVS v. Latvia LVA 28/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment of prisoners by escort officers in the premises of the Riga Regional Court in and lack of effective investigations. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12668
BALAZS v. Hungary
BALAZS v. Hungary HUN 14/03/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning violations of the prohibition of discrimination read in conjunction with the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10593
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BALTA AND DEMIR v. Turkey
BALTA AND DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 23/09/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction on the basis of a statement by an anonymous witness whom neither the applicants nor the trial court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37356
BALTINS v. Latvia
BALTINS v. Latvia LVA 08/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:32:42 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic courts failure to properly address the incitement plea in criminal proceedings raised by the applicant who claimed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31154
BARANOWSKI v. Poland
BARANOWSKI v. Poland POL 28/03/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention on remand on the sole basis of a bill of indictment beyond the period set in the detention order and delayed decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17781
BARATTA v. Italy
BARATTA v. Italy ITA 13/01/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention as a result of criminal proceedings in absentia leading to life imprisonment of the accused in which he had been declared EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28272
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania (no 1)
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania no 1 ROU 05/01/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Abuse suffered by the applicants or their relatives in police custody or upon arrest ineffectiveness of related criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17496
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BASENKO v. Ukraine
BASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/02/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Ill treatment of the applicants by State agents a public transport employee and two volunteer citizen guards and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32270