Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 461 - 480 of 601
ROZANSKI v. Poland
ROZANSKI v. Poland POL 18/08/2006 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Lacking protection of family life due to inability of a putative father to seek legal paternity by means of a procedure directly accessible to him introduction of such a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39878
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 11/10/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: Right to liberty functioning of justice: Unlawful administrative detention without a court order and excessively lengthy detention on remand unfair criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33465
RYBACKI v. Poland
RYBACKI v. Poland POL 13/04/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of detention on remand as the grounds for prolonging detention were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17989
S.F. v. Switzerland
S.F. v. Switzerland CHE 30/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of police to prevent a suicide committed in an unusual way by a vulnerable detainee left unguarded in a police cell for forty minutes without paying EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56081
S.P.R.L. ANCA ET AL v. Belgium
S.P.R.L. ANCA ET AL v. Belgium BEL 18/05/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the participation of a representative of the prosecutor s office in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1373
SÄRGAVA v. Estonia
S RGAVA v. Estonia EST 16/02/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of sufficient procedural safeguards to protect privileged data during the seizure and the subsequent examination of a lawyer s laptop and mobile EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59837
S.S. BALIKLICESME BELDESI TAR. KAL. KOOPERATIFI v. Turkey
S.S. BALIKLICESME BELDESI TAR. KAL. KOOPERATIFI v. Turkey TUR 28/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:57:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic courts failure to provide a copy of the written opinion of Public Prosecutor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33393
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SABER v. Norway
SABER v. Norway NOR 17/03/2021 00:00:00 12/04/2021 16:35:54 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab. Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57185
SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia
SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia ARM 08/10/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56047
SAKIR v. Greece
SAKIR v. Greece GRC 24/06/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of effective investigations into the assault on a migrant of Afghan nationality including the authorities failure to take into account the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15691
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SALAPA v. Poland
SALAPA v. Poland POL 19/03/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of correspondence and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Deprivation of liberty by decision of the public prosecutor who was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17711
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia LVA 30/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to covert interception in of telephone conversations in the framework of the criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12674
SARA v. the Republic of Moldova
SARA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/01/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary arrest and detention of the applicant in criminal proceedings without him having a formal procedural status of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7138
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SAVATIN v. Romania
SAVATIN v. Romania ROU 13/12/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 16:48:18 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment suffered by the applicant in 2010 as a result of the conduct of the law enforcement officers substantive violation of Article 3 . Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45757
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 26/10/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the hindrance by the authorities of the effective exercise by the applicant of his right of petition to the Court by failing to provide him with copies of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31622
SC MASINEXPORTIMPORT INDUSTRIAL GROUP SA v. Romania
SC MASINEXPORTIMPORT INDUSTRIAL GROUP SA v. Romania ROU 01/03/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Unfair proceedings due to the annulment of a final court decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16543