Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 201 - 220 of 240
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767
STOICESCU (I) v. Romania
STOICESCU I v. Romania ROU 26/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to comply with the obligation to protect the applicant s physical and psychological EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17498
STRAISTA v. the Republic of Moldova
STRAISTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the authorities in 2014 to protect the applicant s right to private life and to carry out an effective investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59901
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
SUSO MUSA v. Malta
SUSO MUSA v. Malta MLT 09/12/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and against ill treatment: Arbitrary detention of asylum seekers without effective and speedy remedy under domestic law to challenge the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4127
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TARARIYEVA v. Russia
TARARIYEVA v. Russia RUS 14/03/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Authorities failure to protect the right to life of the applicant s son due to the lack of adequate medical care in prison and defective medical assistance at a public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13715
TARMAN v. Turkey
TARMAN v. Turkey TUR 21/02/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to protect the applicant s reputation due to the dismissal of her claims for damages against the editor in chief and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49025
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice / Protection of private life: Failure to protect the applicants from private activities producing a dangerous effects EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37302
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
THLIMMENOS v. Greece
THLIMMENOS v. Greece GRC 06/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Discrimination on religious grounds / access to and effective functioning of justice: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant due to the authorities refusal to appoint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22168
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703
TOMA v. Romania
TOMA v. Romania ROU 24/05/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Ill treatment in police custody and lack of an effective investigation delay in bringing the applicant before a judge and lack of a speedy judicial review following his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16421
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39501
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
TZEKOV v. Bulgaria
TZEKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 23/05/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Death life threatening injury or ill treatment during arrests due to the unjustified and/or disproportionate use of fire EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14866
UKRAINIAN MEDIA GROUP v. Ukraine
UKRAINIAN MEDIA GROUP v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of the applicant company for publishing articles criticising political candidates on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26156