Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 2181 - 2200 of 2276
WETJEN AND OTHERS v. Germany
WETJEN AND OTHERS v. Germany DEU 22/06/2018 00:00:00 31/07/2018 10:38:13 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unilateral declaration by which the respondent State acknowledged that the length of the interim proceedings with regard to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49955
WIESER AND BICOS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH v. Austria
WIESER AND BICOS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH v. Austria AUT 16/01/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unlawful search and seizure of electronic data in a lawyer s owner and general manager of a limited liability EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1013
WIESER v. Austria
WIESER v. Austria AUT 22/05/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Unjustified strip search during arrest amounting to degrading treatment. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1061
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 11/09/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex on the ground that social benefits for widowed parents were only available EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2550
WISSE v. France
WISSE v. France FRA 20/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the recording of remand detainees conversations with their relatives in detention centres visiting rooms. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33245
WITEK v. Poland
WITEK v. Poland POL 11/04/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful placement in a psychiatric hospital on the basis of an expert opinion delayed ordering and examination by the district court of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19105
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland POL 04/04/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention in a sobering up centre. Article 5 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17757
WLOCH v. Poland
WLOCH v. Poland POL 22/01/2001 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Unlawful detention lack of adversarial principle in the review proceedings and excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17769
WLOCH v. Poland (no. 2)
WLOCH v. Poland no. 2 POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Refusal of a domestic court to grant compensation under the relevant provisions for the applicant s unlawful detention on remand. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39929
WODITSCHKA v. Austria
WODITSCHKA v. Austria AUT 21/01/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / discrimination on the ground of sex: Discriminatory treatment of a male homosexual sentenced to a fine or a suspended prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-985
WOJCIECHOWSKI v. Poland
WOJCIECHOWSKI v. Poland POL 05/06/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and efficient functioning of justice: Disregard of presumption of innocence due to the grounds used by courts to motivate decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18649
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland POL 12/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: Conditions of detention / Protection against ill treatment: Inadequate prison conditions in Siedlce Prison in an overcrowded cells. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50023
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447
WOOD+ v. the United Kingdom
WOOD v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/03/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Detention by order of the magistrates court following proceedings for neglect to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2646
WORWA v. Poland
WORWA v. Poland POL 14/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unjustified interference due to the circumstances in which the applicant became subject to a series of psychiatric reports in criminal proceedings. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17755
X AND Y v. Croatia
X AND Y v. Croatia HRV 03/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Denial of a fair hearing due to lack of procedural safeguards in proceedings divesting the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10109
X v. Croatia
X v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Exclusion of the applicants in the case of X the applicant was divested of her capacity to act while in the case of A.K. and L. the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10089
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Slovenia
X v. Slovenia SVN 28/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to exercise the required diligence in the proceedings concerning the withdrawal of the applicant s parental rights which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7220
X v. Sweden
X v. Sweden SWE 09/04/2018 00:00:00 02/05/2018 10:26:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation ordered by the Migration Agency and confirmed by the Migration Court to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49349