Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 421 - 440 of 2276
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden SWE 25/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: This case concerns the alleged risk that the applicant foundation s communications had been or would be intercepted and examined by way of signals intelligence as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57667
CERNAK v. Slovakia
CERNAK v. Slovakia SVK 14/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: failure to guarantee adequate review of lawfulness of detention as the applicant s representatives had limited possibilities to consult the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7705
CERVENKA v. the Czech Republic
CERVENKA v. the Czech Republic CZE 13/01/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 12:47:30 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Placement in a social care home without sufficient guarantees against arbitrariness and possibility to seek compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46183
CESKY v. the Czech Republic
CESKY v. the Czech Republic CZE 04/10/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6052
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CEVIZOVIC v. Germany
CEVIZOVIC v. Germany DEU 29/10/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of the applicant s detention on remand and the excessive length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38354
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/11/1996 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment protection of rights in detention effective remedy: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation to India lack of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2388
CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. France
CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. France FRA 29/04/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property / discrimination / freedom of association: Disproportionate interference due to the imposition on landowners to join approved hunting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32979
CHEEMA v. France
CHEEMA v. France FRA 17/09/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities refusal of the request of an Indian national residing in France for family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33115
CHENGELYAN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
CHENGELYAN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 21/07/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure by courts to respect the final character of a judgment ordering the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3931
CHIS v. Romania
CHIS v. Romania ROU 21/02/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 14:32:42 Case Description: Functioning of justice / protection of property rights: Non implementation or delayed implementation of final domestic court decisions delivered against the State or legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15856
CHIUMIENTO v. Italy
CHIUMIENTO v. Italy ITA 11/12/2006 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Electoral rights protection of private life and effective remedy: Restrictions of various rights ordered in bankruptcy proceedings i.e. suspension of electoral rights and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44433
CHOBANOV AND KOYRUSHKI v. Bulgaria
CHOBANOV AND KOYRUSHKI v. Bulgaria BGR 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment conditions of detention: Poor detention conditions and/or restrictive penitentiary regimes lack of an effective remedy as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55295
CHORNIY v. Ukraine
CHORNIY v. Ukraine UKR 16/08/2013 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:02:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure of judicial authorities to provide the applicant with adequate facilities for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26452
CHOWDURY AND OTHERS v. Greece
CHOWDURY AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 30/06/2017 00:00:00 21/07/2017 15:08:00 Case Description: Slavery and forced labour: Failure to prevent the human trafficking of 42 applicants nationals of Bangladesh and their subjection to agricultural labour EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47491
CHRISTENSEN v. Denmark
CHRISTENSEN v. Denmark DNK 22/04/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:02:09 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice lack of respective remedy and protection of property: Excessive length of one set of civil proceedings for medical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3301
CHRUSCINSKI v. Poland
CHRUSCINSKI v. Poland POL 06/02/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of equality of arms and of respect of the adversarial principle in review proceedings concerning the lawfulness of detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18699
CIAPAS v. Lithuania
CIAPAS v. Lithuania LTU 16/02/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Censorship of a detainee s correspondence during pre trial detention and imprisonment. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4215
CICCOLELLA v. Italy
CICCOLELLA v. Italy ITA 15/04/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and electoral rights: Unjustified interference due to the imposition of limitations on the applicants personal capacity and the fact that they EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44505
CIFTCI v. Austria
CIFTCI v. Austria AUT 20/08/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant being sentenced to a prohibition of residence following a conviction for drugs EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-777