Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 781 - 800 of 2276
GORMUS AND OTHERS v. Turkey
GORMUS AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 19/04/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicants right to impart information on account of the search operation conducted in their workplace by the authorities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37344
GORODNITCHEV v. Russia
GORODNITCHEV v. Russia RUS 12/11/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Poor conditions of detention in facilities under the authority of the Ministries of Justice and of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14070
GORODOVYCH v. Ukraine
GORODOVYCH v. Ukraine UKR 19/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of effective investigations into the applicant s complaint of inadequate medical treatment. Article 3 procedural limb Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45971
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Inability of the applicant to challenge the lawfulness of his continued detention for compulsory medical treatment in the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31314
GORYAYNOVA v. Ukraine
GORYAYNOVA v. Ukraine UKR 08/01/2021 00:00:00 29/01/2021 19:13:35 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate dismissal in 2007 of the applicant a prosecutor who published an open letter on the internet criticising prosecution authorities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56587
GOSPODARIA TARANEASCA 'ALCAZ G.A.' v. the Republic of Moldova
GOSPODARIA TARANEASCA ALCAZ G.A. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 01/03/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the deprivation of the applicant company s right to deduct the VAT it EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59821
GOVEDARSKI v. Bulgaria
GOVEDARSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 16/05/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment protection of private and family life functioning of justice: Degrading treatment due to the psychological effects of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3987
GOVELL v. the United Kingdom
GOVELL v. the United Kingdom GBR 18/05/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence and lack of a remedy: Unlawful interference due to the use of covert listening devices in residences or the workplace EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2464
GOZUM v. Turkey
GOZUM v. Turkey TUR 20/04/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Inability under domestic law for a single adoptive mother to have her forename recorded on child s identity papers in place of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37352
GRAFOV v. Ukraine
GRAFOV v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the lack of compensation for the annulment of the applicant s bona fide property rights to a shed due to the State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51067
GRAMICCIA v. Italy
GRAMICCIA v. Italy ITA 06/02/2003 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44044
GRANT v. the United Kingdom
GRANT v. the United Kingdom GBR 23/08/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure to recognise legally the change of gender of a post operative male to female transsexual person and the refusal to pay her a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2868
GRASSO v. Italy
GRASSO v. Italy ITA 13/02/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to restrictions of personal capacity and access restrictions to professional activities as a result of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44721
GRAUSLYS v. Lithuania
GRAUSLYS v. Lithuania LTU 10/01/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Unlawful detention failure to bring the applicant promptly before a judge and lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4169
GRAUZINIS v. Lithuania
GRAUZINIS v. Lithuania LTU 10/01/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of a regular judicial review of the applicant s detention on remand. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4173
GRAVA v. Italy
GRAVA v. Italy ITA 10/10/2003 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention as the judicial decision granting remission of sentence to which the applicant was entitled by law was pronounced too late EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43408
GRECH AND OTHERS v. Malta
GRECH AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 15/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to a requisition order which had been found by the domestic courts to be in violation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52411
GRIFHORST v. France
GRIFHORST v. France FRA 26/05/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Interference due to the disproportionate nature of the penalty imposed for failure to declare a sum of money to the customs authorities under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33025
GRIMKOVSKAYA v. Ukraine
GRIMKOVSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 21/10/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the level of noise vibration and air and soil pollution caused by a motorway re routed next EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31577
GRONMARK v. Finland
GRONMARK v. Finland FIN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the absolute nature of the limitation period for bringing an action to establish paternity. Article 8 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5974