Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. Armenia
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. Armenia ARM 16/06/2015 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: The case concerns six Azerbaijani nationals who were forced to flee from their homes during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-353
D. J. v. Croatia
D. J. v. Croatia HRV 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of private life: Failure to conduct an effective and adequate investigation into the applicant s allegations of rape in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10139
DZINIC v. Croatia
DZINIC v. Croatia HRV 17/08/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due the domestic courts failure to assess the value of a property they ordered to be seized with a view to securing the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10195
FINOGENOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
FINOGENOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 06/04/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants right to life on account of the authorities failures in connection with two terrorist attacks Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14098
FLORESCU v. Romania
FLORESCU v. Romania ROU 08/06/2007 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just satisfaction for non pecuniary damage paid. The payment of the sums awarded by the Court in respect of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12842
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v. Poland
HUTTEN CZAPSKA v. Poland POL 19/06/2006 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of property: Systemic problem the malfunctioning of national legislation on housing in that: it imposed restrictions on landlords rights and did not provide EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39852
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
MAKAROVA v. Russia
MAKAROVA v. Russia RUS 01/01/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the State s failure to assist the applicants in securing enforcement of judgments delivered in their favour in the proceedings they initiated EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14100
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to take operational measures in line with international standards to protect two minors who were prosecuted in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58063
VEKIC v. Croatia
VEKIC v. Croatia HRV 22/04/2021 00:00:00 23/04/2021 09:38:23 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due the domestic courts failure to assess the value of a property they ordered to be seized with a view to securing the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57401