Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 78
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ACCARDO v. Italy
ACCARDO v. Italy ITA 17/03/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Sustained impossibility for the applicants to obtain the assistance of the police to implement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44132
AKIMOVA v. Azerbaijan
AKIMOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 27/12/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the Appeals Court decision while recognising the applicant as lawful tenant to postpone the execution of an eviction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1812
ALPAY v. Turkey
ALPAY v. Turkey TUR 27/02/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities delay in paying the applicants additional compensation for the expropriation between the applicable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28629
ANAGNOSTOU-DEDOULI v. Greece
ANAGNOSTOU DEDOULI v. Greece GRC 16/12/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:42:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non compliance or delayed compliance with domestic court judgments ordering the lifting of land expropriation orders EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15139
ATKINSON v. the United Kingdom
ATKINSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/04/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of gender of a widower in that social benefits for widowed parents the Widowed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2770
B.T. v. Turkey
B.T. v. Turkey TUR 14/11/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities delay in paying the applicants remainders of compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28537
BALAN v. the Republic of Moldova
BALAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 29/04/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference as a result of the unlawful use as a background for the identity cards issued by the Ministry of Internal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6790
BASMENKOVA v. Bulgaria
BASMENKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 06/04/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 16:13:56 Case Description: This group of cases concerns failure to provide the applicants with compensation for expropriations which took place during the 1980s or the early 1990s. The applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46613
BENEFICIO CAPPELLA PAOLINI v. San Marino
BENEFICIO CAPPELLA PAOLINI v. San Marino SMR 13/10/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:40:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Excessive length of proceedings concerning the partial restitution of land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11180
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 28/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unjust limitations on the use of property by landlords in particular through the rent control scheme. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7709
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801
C.A.R. S.R.L. v. Italy
C.A.R. S.R.L. v. Italy ITA 17/01/1998 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Protection of property and effective remedy: Refusal to provide police assistance to evict a group of persons occupying illegally the applicant company s property despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45156
CAIRNEY v. the United Kingdom
CAIRNEY v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/11/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory entitlement of widowers to social benefits. Article 8 14 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3033
CARNASCIALI v. Italy
CARNASCIALI v. Italy ITA 29/01/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property / access to and effective functioning of justice: Interference due to the applicant s prolonged inability to recover possession of her apartment lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44322
CINGA v. Lithuania
CINGA v. Lithuania LTU 31/01/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate deprivation of the applicant s property in 2008 following the domestic courts decisions to annul the administrative orders by which a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49057
COLIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
COLIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 28/06/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of property: Non enforcement of final domestic court decisions ordering payment of certain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3145
CORNWELL v. the United Kingdom
CORNWELL v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2566
CROSSLAND v. the United Kingdom
CROSSLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 09/02/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as the national Widow s Bereavement Allowance was available only to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2552