Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 841 - 860 of 1003
SOYLER v. Turkey
SOYLER v. Turkey TUR 20/01/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Electoral rights: Interference due to automatic loss of the right to vote by persons sentenced to imprisonment for intentional criminal offences for the entire duration of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37192
SPASOV v. Romania
SPASOV v. Romania ROU 06/03/2023 00:00:00 02/06/2023 09:28:41 Case Description: The case concerns the sentencing of the applicant a Bulgarian national and captain of a vessel fishing in Black Sea waters in 2013 for fishing turbot in Romania s exclusive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62843
STAMENKOVIC v. Serbia
STAMENKOVIC v. Serbia SRB 01/03/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right not to be tried twice non bis in idem because in proceedings between 2010 and 2012 criminal courts convicted him as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59825
STATILEO v. Croatia
STATILEO v. Croatia HRV 10/10/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property between 1997 and 2015 on account of statutory limitations on the use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12093
STEBNITSKIY AND KOMFORT v. Ukraine
STEBNITSKIY AND KOMFORT v. Ukraine UKR 03/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to a court decision concerning the applicant company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31084
STEFANESCU AND OTHERS v. Romania
STEFANESCU AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 12/01/2021 00:00:00 29/01/2021 19:13:35 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the ineffectiveness of the mechanism set up to afford restitution of or compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56571
STEFANOVI v. Bulgaria
STEFANOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 30/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Unjustified deprivation of property on the basis of restitution laws concerning expropriations during the communist regime due to State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46485
STERE AND OTHERS v. Romania
STERE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 23/05/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty due to annulment of final court decisions concerning tax exemptions following an application for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16335
STETSOV v. Ukraine
STETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 11/08/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Disproportionate and unjustified interference due to a travel ban imposed on the applicant on account of a failure to reimburse a debt established by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58329
STOCKHOLMS FORSAKRINGS- OCH SKADESTANDSJURIDIK AB v. Sweden
STOCKHOLMS FORSAKRINGS OCH SKADESTANDSJURIDIK AB v. Sweden SWE 16/12/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant company s obligation to pay the costs arising from a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2116
STOJANOVSKI AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
STOJANOVSKI AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 23/01/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the dismissal of the applicants claims in restitution proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6548
STOLKOWSKI v. Poland
STOLKOWSKI v. Poland POL 21/03/2022 00:00:00 07/04/2022 12:15:01 Case Description: Excessive individual burden on applicant who did not receive compensation in 2015 after lengthy impoundment of his car in police car park between 2005 and 2010/2011 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60121
STOYANOV AND TABAKOV v. Bulgaria
STOYANOV AND TABAKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 26/02/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: All of these cases concern the failure by different administrative authorities to comply with final domestic judgments obliging them to deliver a non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1915
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 30/11/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The violations found in the 16 judgments currently 1 examined in this group originated in structural deficiencies in the mechanisms set up in Romania as of 1990 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12742
STRETCH v. the United Kingdom
STRETCH v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/12/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the denial of the applicant s option to prolong for a further term a lease concluded with a local EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2620
STRUNGARIU v. Romania
STRUNGARIU v. Romania ROU 29/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure to enforce final judicial decisions ordering the applicants reinstatement in the posts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13085
SUCIU v. Romania
SUCIU v. Romania ROU 10/02/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to lack of appropriate compensation following the cancellation of a contract signed by the applicant with a State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16087
SUD EST REALISATIONS v. France
SUD EST REALISATIONS v. France FRA 02/03/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:29:13 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to refusal over a long period of time to provide police assistance for the eviction from its property of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31096
SUK v. Ukraine
SUK v. Ukraine UKR 10/06/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of property: domestic courts arbitrary dismissal of the applicant s claims for recovery of annual payments to be paid from the State budget on the ground of lacking of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31146
SUKHANOV AND ILCHENKO v. Ukraine
SUKHANOV AND ILCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern the interference with the applicants rights under Article 1 of Protocol No.1 legitimate expectation resulting from the failure of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32283