Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 961 - 980 of 1003
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 11/09/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex on the ground that social benefits for widowed parents were only available EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2550
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447
WYSZYNSKI v. Poland
WYSZYNSKI v. Poland POL 24/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: Arbitrary dismissal in 2011 of a claim for compensation against the Poznan Municipality related to its failure to provide social housing to a tenant occupying the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60713
X AND OTHERS v. Albania
X AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 31/08/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: The case concerns failure of the authorities to implement swift and comprehensive desegregation measures in an elementary school the Naim Frash ri elementary school in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61097
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.B. v. Russia
Y.B. v. Russia RUS 20/10/2021 00:00:00 05/11/2021 13:57:21 Case Description: The case concerns court s refusal in 2017 to reinstate the time limit for appeal in non procedural letter without holding a hearing on the grounds that conviction in absentia was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58829
YABLOKO RUSSIAN UNITED DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND OTHERS v. Russia
YABLOKO RUSSIAN UNITED DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 24/04/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Violation of the right to free elections due to illegal and/or disproportionate annulment of candidacy for regional legislative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47003
YAKISIR v. Turkey
YAKISIR v. Turkey TUR 30/12/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation granted by domestic courts for expropriation and on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30130
YASAR HOLDING A.S. v. Turkey
YASAR HOLDING A.S. v. Turkey TUR 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference unforeseeable and incompatible with the principle of legality on account of the transfer of management and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48307
YEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
YEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/10/2021 00:00:00 11/03/2022 09:07:20 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to property on account of the emergency expropriation proceedings conducted and completed on the basis of Council of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59853
YENER & OTHERS v. Turkey
YENER OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Delays in payment of additional compensation for expropriation and application of an insufficient rate of default interest. Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30362
YETIS AND OTHERS v. Turkey
YETIS AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 06/10/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of failure to pay the difference between the value of the compensation for the expropriation on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37288
YILDIRIR v. Turkey
YILDIRIR v. Turkey TUR 24/02/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on the ground of the authorities ordering demolition without compensation of the applicant s house purchased in good EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37152
YILTAS YILDIZ TURISTIK TESISLERI A.S. v. Turkey
YILTAS YILDIZ TURISTIK TESISLERI A.S. v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the unreasonably low amount of compensation compared to the value of the property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5494
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/07/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 18:23:43 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities refusal to provide compensation in the form of company shares for property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50293
YUKSELLER LTD. STI. v. Turkey
YUKSELLER LTD. STI. v. Turkey TUR 19/01/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s de facto expropriation without adequate compensation and domestic courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56857
YURIY LOBANOV v. Russia
YURIY LOBANOV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Protection of property: Authorities failure to set up a legislative or regulatory procedure for the implementation of the applicants right to redemption of the State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13751
YURUKOVA AND SAMUNDZHI v. Bulgaria
YURUKOVA AND SAMUNDZHI v. Bulgaria BGR 02/10/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference in respect of the first applicant as in the restitution proceedings for recovery of property acquired EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3847
YUSUF CELEBI v. Turkey (no. 2)
YUSUF CELEBI v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 18/12/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26634