Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 341 - 360 of 413
SHAW v. Hungary
SHAW v. Hungary HUN 26/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10523
SHPAKOVSKIY v. Russia
SHPAKOVSKIY v. Russia RUS 07/10/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Non enforcement of domestic judgments ordering authorities to provide the applicants with flats EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14092
SIGURDARDOTTIR v. Islande
SIGURDARDOTTIR v. Islande ISL 30/05/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Rejection by district court of the applicant s request for compensation in respect of her arrest and detention on remand although EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55
SIMSEK v. Turkey
SIMSEK v. Turkey TUR 30/07/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention without any judicial review and impossibility to challenge speedily the lawfulness of the applicant s detention as he had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28579
SIVOVA AND KOLEVA v. Bulgaria
SIVOVA AND KOLEVA v. Bulgaria BGR 04/06/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1903
SKONDRIANOS v. Greece
SKONDRIANOS v. Greece GRC 18/03/2004 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the dismissal by the Court of Cassation of appeals on points of law against criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22274
STAMOSE v. Bulgaria
STAMOSE v. Bulgaria BGR 27/02/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Unjustified and disproportionate interference with freedom of movement and absence of effective remedy: Two years travel ban for having breached the Immigration Rules of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14445
STANKOV AND UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION «ILINDEN» v. Bulgaria
STANKOV AND UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. Bulgaria BGR 02/01/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Freedom of association: Disproportionate interference due to restrictions on public commemorative meetings of an organisation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14269
STOLLENWERK v. Germany
STOLLENWERK v. Germany DEU 07/12/2017 00:00:00 24/01/2018 09:34:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms because the Court of Appeal took its decisions relating to the continuation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48749
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania ALB 21/05/2020 00:00:00 18/08/2020 10:08:56 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant a person suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was found not criminally liable for attempted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55687
SUDITA KEITA v. Hungary
SUDITA KEITA v. Hungary HUN 12/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the stateless applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the protracted failure of the authorities notably for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55805
SUKACHOV v. Ukraine
SUKACHOV v. Ukraine UKR 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55367
SUKRAN AYDIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
SUKRAN AYDIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference on account of the applicants conviction for having spoken Kurdish during election campaigns in 2002 2004 and 2007 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37340
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom GBR 02/09/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of correspondence in detention: Unjustified monitoring by prison authorities of medical correspondence between the applicant a convicted prisoner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2804
TAMRAZYAN v. Armenia
TAMRAZYAN v. Armenia ARM 19/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns unfair administrative proceedings connected to the alienation to a third person of a plot of land adjacent to Teghut village in the Tavoush region of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54973
TARVERDIYEV v. Azerbaijan
TARVERDIYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 26/10/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These cases concern the non enforcement of final domestic court decisions violations of Article 6 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 entailing three different kinds EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1757
TAS v. Turkey
TAS v. Turkey TUR 19/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unjustified interference with freedom of expression on account of convictions under former Article 8 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30670
TEK GIDA IS SENDIKASI v. Turkey
TEK GIDA IS SENDIKASI v. Turkey TUR 04/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to form and join trade unions on account of the dismissal in 2004 of forty employees working in three factories of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47507
TETE v. France
TETE v. France FRA 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for malicious falsehoods on account of an open letter which he had written to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55749
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland FIN 15/10/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings as the applicant company was not allowed by Supreme Administrative Court to submit comments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4814