Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
CROSSLAND v. the United Kingdom
CROSSLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 09/02/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as the national Widow s Bereavement Allowance was available only to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2552
CUSAN AND FAZZO v. Italy
CUSAN AND FAZZO v. Italy ITA 07/04/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private and family life: Impossibility under domestic law to register a married couple s legitimate child at birth in the civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28246
DIMICI v. Turkey
DIMICI v. Turkey TUR 14/11/2022 00:00:00 05/12/2022 18:05:55 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of prohibition of discrimination taken together with protection of property on account of the domestic courts refusal to allow a woman to receive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62024
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
FEILAZOO v. Malta
FEILAZOO v. Malta MLT 11/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns the inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention pending deportation in the periods from 16 to 23 May 2019 and from 15 September 2019 to 13 November EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57955
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
M. G. C. v. Romania
M. G. C. v. Romania ROU 15/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Judgments: M.G.C. v. Romania No. 61495/11 final on 15/06/2016 I.C. v. Romania No. 36934/08 final on 24/08/2016 These cases concern breaches of the State s positive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13219
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 15:06:12 Case Description: These cases concern a structural problem highlighted by the European Court applying the pilot judgment procedure of inhuman and degrading treatment caused by the poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52617
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592