Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 161 - 180 of 676
DINK v. Turkey
DINK v. Turkey TUR 14/12/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of the conviction of the journalist and newspaper editor F rat Dink for denigrating Turkishness EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37184
DODOV v. Bulgaria
DODOV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/04/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Right to life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Absence in practice of effective judicial remedies allowing to establish the circumstances of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14625
DOERGA v. the Netherlands
DOERGA v. the Netherlands NLD 27/07/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to his conviction on the basis of the improper use of information obtained through the interception of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4515
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3137
DOLNEANU v. the Republic of Moldova
DOLNEANU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/02/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property and lack of an effective remedy: Belated payment of an amount due to him on the basis of a decision of Parliament adopted in 1994 for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6782
DONNELLY v. the United Kingdom
DONNELLY v. the United Kingdom GBR 11/04/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal in respect of the court martial proceedings. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2488
DORNEANU v. Romania
DORNEANU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman treatment suffered by the applicant an inmate afflicted with terminal prostate cancer. The European Court ruled that his continued detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49135
DRAFT - OVA A.S. v. Slovakia
DRAFT OVA A.S. v. Slovakia SVK 09/09/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial on account of extraordinary appeals lodged by the Prosecutor General and allowed by the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7721
DRAGAN PETROVIC v. Serbia
DRAGAN PETROVIC v. Serbia SRB 14/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of taking from him a DNA saliva sample in the context of a criminal investigation in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55793
DRAGOTONIU v. Romania
DRAGOTONIU v. Romania ROU 24/08/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: No punishment without law: Criminal conviction of the applicants for acts which did not constitute a criminal offence under the national law in force at the material time. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16163
DRUZSTEVNI ZALOZNA PRIA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
DRUZSTEVNI ZALOZNA PRIA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/01/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of property and Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Placement of a credit union in receivership without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6154
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern the interference with the applicants right to respect for their home and private and family life Article 8 . In the Dubetska and others case the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31571
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
E.L., R.L. AND J.O.-L. v. Switzerland
E.L. R.L. AND J.O. L. v. Switzerland CHE 29/08/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the applicants had as heirs been convicted of a tax offence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4640
EBERHARD AND M. v. Slovenia
EBERHARD AND M. v. Slovenia SVN 01/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take adequate and effective steps to enforce an administrative access order and inefficient subsequent court proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7110
EBRU & TAYFUN ENGIN COLAK v. Turkey
EBRU TAYFUN ENGIN COLAK v. Turkey TUR 30/08/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to inability of domestic courts to settle in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37370
EDATA-TRANS S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova
EDATA TRANS S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 17/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to on account of the authorities refusal in 2006 to accept the deduction of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54965
EDELMAYER v. Austria
EDELMAYER v. Austria AUT 19/12/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Prohibition of double conviction: Conviction of the applicant by the administrative authorities for driving while drunk and subsequent conviction by the criminal courts for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-869
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to freedom of expression due to criminal or civil convictions between 2000 and 2011 for invading the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5968
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163