Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 298
A.B. v. the Netherlands
A.B. v. the Netherlands NLD 29/04/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unjustified interference due to the control of a detainee s correspondence with the European Commission of Human Rights by prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4373
A. v. Croatia
A. v. Croatia HRV 14/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to provide adequate protection against domestic violence due to various shortcomings e.g. individual programme during prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10339
ABDULLAHI ELMI v. Malta
ABDULLAHI ELMI v. Malta MLT 22/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / reception of asylum seekers / protection of tights in detention: Degrading treatment of minor asylum seekers their unlawful detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46351
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ADYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia
ADYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia ARM 12/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 11:26:20 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Failure of authorities to make appropriate allowances for Jehovah s Witnesses conscience and their beliefs on the basis of which they refused to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48793
AERTS v. Belgium
AERTS v. Belgium BEL 30/07/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / access to and effective functioning of justice: Lawfulness of the applicant s detention in a psychiatric wing of a prison pending his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1369
AGROTEHSERVIS v. Ukraine
AGROTEHSERVIS v. Ukraine UKR 30/11/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty as well as of right to property on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26152
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
ALICAN DEMIR v. Turkey
ALICAN DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 25/05/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Delay in the domestic court s decision on a detainee s conditional release 20 days after he had fulfilled all conditions and lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37348
ALIKAJ AND OTHERS v. Italy
ALIKAJ AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 15/09/2011 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:32:56 Case Description: Right to life: Excessive use of force by police resulting in the death of the applicants relative shot while resisting arrest imprudent behaviour of the police agent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45042
ALVER v. Estonia
ALVER v. Estonia EST 08/02/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Detention on remand in Tallinn Central Prison and J geva District Arrest House in conditions of overcrowding absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3067
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ANTUNES TOMAS REBOCH v. Portugal
ANTUNES TOMAS REBOCH v. Portugal PRT 30/07/1999 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9391
ARBEITER v. Austria
ARBEITER v. Austria AUT 25/04/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary restriction without sufficient and relevant reason by an injunction of domestic courts in the context of a political debate on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-481
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia ARM 15/09/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Ashot Harutynyan 34334/04 final on 15/09/2010 Jhangiryan 44765/08 final on 18/05/2021 Shirkhanyan 54547/16 final on 22/05/2022 Voskanyan 623/13 final on 24/01/2023 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-349
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
ASSOCIATION OF THE VICTIMES OF SC ROMPETROL SA ET GEOMIN SA SYSTEM AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION OF THE VICTIMES OF SC ROMPETROL SA ET GEOMIN SA SYSTEM AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 25/09/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 The text for this case is undergoing review and will be published at a later date Romania EXEC 38477 association, EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16547
AVANESYAN v. Armenia
AVANESYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/10/2021 00:00:00 19/11/2021 15:34:10 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s refusal to perform military service in 2014 because as a Jehovah s Witness his conscience did not allow him to serve in the army. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58877
AVIAKOMPANIYA A.T.I., ZAT v. Ukraine
AVIAKOMPANIYA A.T.I. ZAT v. Ukraine UKR 05/01/2018 00:00:00 15/01/2018 16:40:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the quashing by the Supreme Court acting as second cassation court of decisions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48649