Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 121 - 140 of 198
NARINEN v. Finland
NARINEN v. Finland FIN 01/09/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life / correspondence: Interference due to the opening the applicant s letter by an official receiver appointed to his estate in bankruptcy proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4858
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy ITA 23/05/2016 00:00:00 30/01/2018 12:28:48 Case Description: The case concerns violations arising from an extraordinary rendition operation against the first applicant an Egyptian cleric suspected of terrorism related offences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28282
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
NEKVEDAVICIUS v. Lithuania
NEKVEDAVICIUS v. Lithuania LTU 10/03/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:08:15 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice lack of a remedy and protection of property: Failure to enforce domestic judgments on restoration of property rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4597
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. Russia
OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. Russia RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns different violations concerning tax and enforcement proceedings brought against the applicant oil company leading to its liquidation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14112
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Inhuman and degrading treatment due to handcuffing during in patient treatment of a detainee on remand in a disproportionate manner not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32266
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus CYP 07/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and against ill treatment: Disproportionate and unlawful interference due to the limitation of visiting rights and monitoring of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3201
OPREA v. Romania
OPREA v. Romania ROU 31/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: The case concerns the unlawful detention of the applicant in 2016 due to the authorities lack of diligence to confirm that he had already served his conviction abroad and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62546
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: In the present case the Court found violations of Articles 5 1 and 8 of the Convention on account of the extra legal transfer of all five applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52803
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PAPACHELAS v. Greece
PAPACHELAS v. Greece GRC 25/03/1999 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:33:21 Case Description: Protection of property: Impossibility for the applicants to obtain a compensation for the expropriation of their land because of an irrebuttable statutory presumption EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-21602
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PETYO POPOV v. Bulgaria
PETYO POPOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/04/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the fact that the accused or his lawyer were not informed of the date of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3801
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455
PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia
PROJECT TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia HRV 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns the unlawful interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions due to the cancellation and revocation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57449
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596