Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 34 of 34
M.S. v. Belgium
M.S. v. Belgium BEL 30/04/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Forced return to Iraq despite the risk of ill treatment: failure of Belgium authorities to obtain diplomatic assurances from the Iraqi authorities stating that the applicant who EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1539
MURADYAN v. Armenia
MURADYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicants sons right to life during their military service as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46287
MUSHTA v. Ukraine
MUSHTA v. Ukraine UKR 18/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty on account of the application of unclear and unforeseeable procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31769
NEVES CARATÃO PINTO v. Portugal
NEVES CARAT O PINTO v. Portugal PRT 13/10/2021 00:00:00 24/01/2022 11:55:19 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of various deficiencies in the framework of application of special protective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59461
PAUL AND AUDREY EDWARDS v. the United Kingdom
PAUL AND AUDREY EDWARDS v. the United Kingdom GBR 14/06/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protection the applicants son s life in detention on remand and lack of effective investigations into his violent death EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2628
PEERS v. Greece
PEERS v. Greece GRC 19/04/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / Conditions of detention in Korydallos men s prison and interference with correspondence. Articles 3 and 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22152
R.R. AND OTHERS v. Hungary
R.R. AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the asylum seeking applicants reception conditions in the R szke transit zone for almost four months in 2017 which were incompatible with Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58097
RAHIMI v. Greece
RAHIMI v. Greece GRC 05/07/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15571
RRAPO v. Albania
RRAPO v. Albania ALB 25/12/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: Co operation with the ECHR and right of individual petition: Failure of the authorities to abide by the ECHR s Order under the rule 39 of the Rules of Court requesting not to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-347
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 21/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: The case concerns the collective expulsion by Italy to Greece of four migrants intercepted as stowaways on ferries arriving in the port of Ancona between January EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15559
SUSO MUSA v. Malta
SUSO MUSA v. Malta MLT 09/12/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and against ill treatment: Arbitrary detention of asylum seekers without effective and speedy remedy under domestic law to challenge the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4127
SZUROVECZ v. Hungary
SZUROVECZ v. Hungary HUN 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of the applicant journalists freedom of expression on account of the refusal in 2015 Szurovecz and 2016 Erd lyi by the Office of Immigration EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54945
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TARAKHEL v. Switzerland
TARAKHEL v. Switzerland CHE 04/11/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:13:37 Case Description: Risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 in case of an Afghan asylum seeking family s return to Italy under Dublin II Regulation without the authorities having first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5920