Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 101 - 120 of 123
SIZAREV v. Ukraine
SIZAREV v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to ensure the applicant s safety in detention in the Yevpatoriya Temporary Detention Facility ITT administered by the police in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31128
SKENDZIC AND KRZNARIC v. Croatia
SKENDZIC AND KRZNARIC v. Croatia HRV 20/04/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigations into war crimes committed during the Croatian Homeland War 1991 1995 against the applicants next of kin who EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12091
SLAVA JURISIC v. Croatia
SLAVA JURISIC v. Croatia HRV 08/02/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction to a prison sentence for defamation of a mayor and a private individual in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48877
SMIRNOV v. Russia
SMIRNOV v. Russia RUS 12/11/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns searches in the framework of the criminal investigation without sufficient and relevant grounds or safeguards against interference with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13579
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia SRB 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the ineffective investigations into the allegations of ill treatment by police officers procedural violations of Article 3 ill treatment by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7310
STEFANELLI v. San Marino
STEFANELLI v. San Marino SMR 08/05/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:41:24 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing at first instance and on appeal. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11190
STEFANOV v. Bulgaria
STEFANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 03/08/2001 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for having refused to serve in the army on the ground of conscientious EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14281
TARANEKS v. Latvia
TARANEKS v. Latvia LVA 02/03/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the domestic court s failure to properly address the incitement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12660
TEIXEIRA DE CASTRO v. Portugal
TEIXEIRA DE CASTRO v. Portugal PRT 09/06/1998 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of fair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s conviction for offences committed on incitement by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9351
THLIMMENOS v. Greece
THLIMMENOS v. Greece GRC 06/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Discrimination on religious grounds / access to and effective functioning of justice: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant due to the authorities refusal to appoint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22168
TIERCE, MARRA AND GABRIELLI v. San Marino
TIERCE MARRA AND GABRIELLI v. San Marino SMR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:41:24 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of impartiality of the judge on the ground of his double EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11186
TONSBERGS BLAD AS AND HAUKOM v. Norway
TONSBERGS BLAD AS AND HAUKOM v. Norway NOR 01/06/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation of a newspaper company and its editor in chief following the publication of an article about seaside EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-191
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
TSVETKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TSVETKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 10/09/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns deprivation of liberty in relation to administrative offences. Violations of Article 5 1 were found on account of: unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50273
ULKE v. Turkey
ULKE v. Turkey TUR 24/04/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants repetitive prosecutions and convictions for refusing to carry out compulsory military service as pacifists and conscientious objectors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37268
VAN DE KOLK v. the Netherlands
VAN DE KOLK v. the Netherlands NLD 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the authorities failure to allow the applicant a suspect of child pornography distribution to be EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52201
VARELA GEIS v. Spain
VARELA GEIS v. Spain ESP 05/06/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in conviction to imprisonment for justification of genocide in which the Audiencia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3549
VEEBER v. Estonia (no. 2)
VEEBER v. Estonia no. 2 EST 21/04/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: No punishment without law: Retrospective application of penal law resulting in the conviction of the applicant under the Penal Codes of 1993 and 1995 respectively for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3059
WOJTAS-KALETA v. Poland
WOJTAS KALETA v. Poland POL 16/10/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Reprimand of a journalist by her employer Polish Public TV for having expressed in an interview and in an open letter her concerns about inter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18347
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459