Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 141 - 160 of 170
SMATANA v. the Czech Republic
SMATANA v. the Czech Republic CZE 31/03/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unjustified prolongation of detention lack of speedy revision in appeal proceedings insufficient certainty concerning the right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6294
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 22/05/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deaths life threatening injuries or ill treatment during arrest and other law enforcement operations. The facts occurred between 2000 and 2009. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12812
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767
STETSOV v. Ukraine
STETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 11/08/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Disproportionate and unjustified interference due to a travel ban imposed on the applicant on account of a failure to reimburse a debt established by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58329
STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. Norway
STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 10/09/2019 00:00:00 22/10/2019 16:32:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns breaches of biological parents rights to family life due to decisions taken between 2011 and 2019 in the public child welfare EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54045
SUFI v. the United Kingdom
SUFI v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/11/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in the context of expulsion/deportation: Risk of ill treatment or killing in case of enforcement of a deportation order to Mogadishu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2913
SVIPSTA v. Latvia
SVIPSTA v. Latvia LVA 09/06/2006 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12622
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
TRZASKA v. Poland
TRZASKA v. Poland POL 11/07/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Pre trial detention: excessive length of detention pending trial and deficiencies in the procedure for reviewing its lawfulness Status of Execution: Measures have centred on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17749
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
ULKE v. Turkey
ULKE v. Turkey TUR 24/04/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants repetitive prosecutions and convictions for refusing to carry out compulsory military service as pacifists and conscientious objectors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37268
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right of access to court on account of the refusal by the domestic courts in 2005 and 2007 respectively to examine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6844
URH v. Croatia
URH v. Croatia HRV 13/01/2022 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right on account that he had been prosecuted and tried twice for the same offence before the Minor Offences Court in 2011 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59405
VAN BOERUM v. the Netherlands
VAN BOERUM v. the Netherlands NLD 31/10/1998 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4465
VAN VLIMMEREN & VAN ILVERENBEEK v. the Netherlands
VAN VLIMMEREN VAN ILVERENBEEK v. the Netherlands NLD 26/09/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings introduced under the Land Development Act to request EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4457
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
VIDAK v. Croatia
VIDAK v. Croatia HRV 23/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of war crimes related proceedings due to the failure of domestic authorities to proceed with the requisite diligence in the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58431
VINKS AND RIBICKA v. Latvia
VINKS AND RIBICKA v. Latvia LVA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference on account of a search of the applicants home and seizures carried out by a special anti EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55329