Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 121 - 132 of 132
URBONAVICIUS v. Lithuania
URBONAVICIUS v. Lithuania LTU 21/05/2019 00:00:00 28/05/2019 14:50:56 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of Kaunas Remand Prison to allow the applicant an apnea medical device violation of Article 3 . Status of Execution: an action report EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52112
VARGA v. Romania
VARGA v. Romania ROU 01/07/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / protection of home: Unlawfulness of the applicants detention on remand after committal for trial and the expiry of the prosecutor s order EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16217
VETTER v. France
VETTER v. France FRA 31/08/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the use of listening devices in the apartment of a third party EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33215
VLADIMIR KHARITONOV v. Russia
VLADIMIR KHARITONOV v. Russia RUS 16/11/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: The Vladimir Kharitonov group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression Article 10 on account of different types of blocking EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56325
VRENCEV v. Serbia
VRENCEV v. Serbia SRB 23/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention in police custody failure to consider any alternative for detention on remand unlawfulness of detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7022
WATSON v. France
WATSON v. France FRA 16/09/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the use of listening devices in the apartment of a third party EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33007
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
Y.U. v. Russia
Y.U. v. Russia RUS 13/02/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to respect for her family life Article 8 on account of the non enforcement of the judgment taken by the Moscow courts in 2008 2009 ordering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14038
YUSUPOVA v. Russia
YUSUPOVA v. Russia RUS 20/03/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 15:55:09 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46595
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia RUS 06/07/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14078