Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 60 of 238
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: The case concerns certain shortcomings in the secret surveillance regime including bulk interception and obtaining communications data from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57685
BIRZIETIS v. Lithuania
BIRZIETIS v. Lithuania LTU 14/09/2016 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:11:49 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unjustified interference due to the authorities refusal to allow a detainee to grow a beard while he was serving a prison sentence due to an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26454
BOLAT v. Russia
BOLAT v. Russia RUS 05/01/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns two violations of the Convention relating to unlawful actions by executive authorities: The first violation relates to the freedom of movement of the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13741
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRINCAT AND OTHERS v. Malta
BRINCAT AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 24/10/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Protection of life and of family life: Exposure of ship yard repair workers to asbestos for a number of years from the 1950s to the early 2000s leading to asbestos EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4123
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801
BULDAKOV v. Russia
BULDAKOV v. Russia RUS 08/03/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Right to individual petition: Failure by prison administration to dispatch the applicant s application form to the ECHR disappearance of the form. Article 34 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13903
BYKOV v. Russia
BYKOV v. Russia RUS 03/10/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Unlawful interference with the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the lack of specific and detailed regulations providing for adequate safeguards EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13645
C.M.F. v. Italy
C.M.F. v. Italy ITA 18/07/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43047
C.M. v. Belgium
C.M. v. Belgium BEL 13/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce judicial decisions ordering the applicant s neighbour to carry out rehabilitation work in order to comply with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49765
C. SRL v. Italy
C. SRL v. Italy ITA 07/11/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42611
CAKA v. Albania
CAKA v. Albania ALB 08/03/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings leading to convictions to terms of imprisonment with regard to following shortcomings: failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-233
CALVAGNO v. Italy
CALVAGNO v. Italy ITA 03/10/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43486
CANALI v. France
CANALI v. France FRA 25/07/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Degrading and inhuman treatment on the ground of conditions of detention in the Charles III Prison in Nancy which was built in 1857 and shut EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28463
CECCHI v. Italy
CECCHI v. Italy ITA 09/01/2003 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Systemic problem of prolonged non enforcement of judicial orders for the eviction of tenants. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43037
CESNULEVICIUS v. Lithuania
CESNULEVICIUS v. Lithuania LTU 10/04/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Right to life and lack of effective investigation: Death of the applicant s son in prison following repeated attacks by other inmates due to the authorities failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4334
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CIUPERCESCU v. Romania (no I)
CIUPERCESCU v. Romania no I ROU 15/09/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and conditions of detention: Degrading regime of weekly full body searches following the prison administration s decision to assign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12736
CONSORTS RICHET AND LE BER v. France
CONSORTS RICHET AND LE BER v. France FRA 18/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Refusal by the State to honour contractual obligations by denying owners the right to build on the island of Porquerolles following EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33065