Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 61 - 80 of 80
SARISHVILI-BOLKVADZE v. Georgia
SARISHVILI BOLKVADZE v. Georgia GEO 19/10/2018 00:00:00 07/12/2018 12:05:13 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to fulfill their positive obligation to protect the life of the applicant s son from medical negligence after an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50723
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/12/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern discrimination against the applicants on account of their ineligibility to stand for election to the Presidency of Bosnia and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3141
SERVET GUNDUZ AND OTHERS v. Turkey
SERVET GUNDUZ AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of the authorities to take the necessary measures that could be reasonably expected to prevent the suicide of the applicants close EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37332
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 22/05/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deaths life threatening injuries or ill treatment during arrest and other law enforcement operations. The facts occurred between 2000 and 2009. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12812
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia RUS 17/07/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly the applicants degrading treatment violations of Article 3 in different periods from 2007 to 2017 on account of their confinement in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14144
SVIT ROZVAG, TOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
SVIT ROZVAG TOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 27/09/2019 00:00:00 17/10/2019 17:25:55 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the suspension on the basis of the 2009 Prohibition Law of the applicants gambling EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52995
TADEVOSYAN v. Armenia
TADEVOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 16/05/2019 00:00:00 28/05/2019 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of property: Interference without public interest due to the domestic courts decision on the non restitution of the applicant s property monetary assets EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52070
TARABURCA v. the Republic of Moldova
TARABURCA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 06/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / action of security forces and lack of an effective remedy: Ill treatment of and injuries caused to the applicants in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6970
TIMOFEYEV v. Russia
TIMOFEYEV v. Russia RUS 23/01/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice/Protection of property/Effective remedy: Non enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning the State s monetary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27520
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703
TRAJKOVSKI AND CHIPOVSKI v. North Macedonia
TRAJKOVSKI AND CHIPOVSKI v. North Macedonia MKD 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: This case concerns an unjustified interference with the applicants right to respect for their private life due the indefinite retention of their DNA EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55579
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
TURAN CAKIR v. Belgium
TURAN CAKIR v. Belgium BEL 10/06/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Ill treatment by the police during arrest and custody and lack of effective investigation in this respect. Failure of authorities to examine whether racist motives played EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1525
VERNES v. France
VERNES v. France FRA 20/04/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Absence of public hearing before Stock Exchange Regulatory Authority in disciplinary proceedings resulting in a permanent ban of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33057
VICENTE CARDOSO v. Portugal
VICENTE CARDOSO v. Portugal PRT 12/03/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:51:34 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of the proceedings in the civil courts of first instance including enforcement proceedings and in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8787
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
YUKHYMOVYCH v. Ukraine
YUKHYMOVYCH v. Ukraine UKR 17/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: The case concerns the killing of the applicant s son in 1999 during an attempt to arrest him violation of substantive limb of Article 2 and ineffective investigation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57099
YURIY LOBANOV v. Russia
YURIY LOBANOV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Protection of property: Authorities failure to set up a legislative or regulatory procedure for the implementation of the applicants right to redemption of the State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13751
ZAICEVS v. Latvia
ZAICEVS v. Latvia LVA 31/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Inability to challenge a sentence to three days administrative detention for contempt of court an offence under the Code of Regulatory EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31212
ZAKHARKIN v. Russia
ZAKHARKIN v. Russia RUS 10/09/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to individual petition on account of a gap in the domestic legislation which did not provide for remand detainees EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13783