Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 161 - 180 of 254
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
OMEROVIC v. Croatia (No. 2)
OMEROVIC v. Croatia No. 2 HRV 14/04/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to the Supreme Court which rejected their appeal on points of law on the ground that they were not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12335
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 09/04/2018 00:00:00 19/07/2018 11:30:51 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicant associations right to freedom of association on account of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49857
OSU v. Italy
OSU v. Italy ITA 11/10/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s inability to challenge his conviction in absentia as his appeal had been rejected EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42500
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PARAPONIARIS v. Greece
PARAPONIARIS v. Greece GRC 06/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:50:40 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Presumption of innocence on account of the imposition of a fine for smuggling by an Indictment Division despite discontinuation of proceedings as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15235
PARFENTYEV v. Russia
PARFENTYEV v. Russia RUS 11/03/2020 00:00:00 12/11/2020 14:39:13 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of failure to consider interference in the applicant s private life by an article. An article was about a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56255
PARSIL v. Turkey
PARSIL v. Turkey TUR 26/07/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Absence of a fair trial on account of the failure to disclose Principal Public Prosecutor s written opinion concerning the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37262
PATRIKOVA v. Bulgaria
PATRIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 22/11/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The case of Patrikova concerns three different violations of Art. 1 of Prot. 1 due to : 1. the unlawful and arbitrary seizure and damage to the applicant s merchandise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3819
PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. Norway
PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 07/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to protect the biological parents right to family life due to shortcomings in the balancing exercise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55909
PELEVIN v. Ukraine
PELEVIN v. Ukraine UKR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the Supreme Court s failure to duly consider the applicant s cassation appeal against his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33457
PELTEREAU-VILLENEUVE v. Switzerland
PELTEREAU VILLENEUVE v. Switzerland CHE 28/01/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence on account of terms used by the prosecutor in his decision to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5870
PENDOV v. Bulgaria
PENDOV v. Bulgaria BGR 12/10/2020 00:00:00 04/11/2020 15:26:31 Case Description: Protection of property rights and freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the unnecessary seizure and retention of the applicant s computer server in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56211
PEREIRA CRUZ AND OTHERS v. Portugal
PEREIRA CRUZ AND OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 26/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: The case concerns the conviction of the applicants in the context of a criminal investigation into a pedophile ring. The Lisbon Court sentenced them to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50417
PERINCEK v. Switzerland
PERINCEK v. Switzerland CHE 15/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal conviction of a Turkish politician and doctor of law for having publicly rejected the legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5850
PETAR MATAS v. Croatia
PETAR MATAS v. Croatia HRV 04/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate restrictions imposed by the authorities on the use of a commercial building pending the assessment whether it has any cultural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45981
PETROVIC v. Croatia
PETROVIC v. Croatia HRV 10/12/2020 00:00:00 10/12/2020 21:35:28 Case Description: This case concerns the inability for the applicant to examine a key witness whose statement was of decisive importance for his convictions in criminal proceedings that took EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56439
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PFEIFER v. Austria
PFEIFER v. Austria AUT 15/02/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure by domestic courts to protect the applicant s reputation against defamatory statements published by the chief editor in a domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-479