Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 198
ABASHEV v. Russia
ABASHEV v. Russia RUS 27/09/2013 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:01:00 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Poor conditions of pre trial detention transport and confinement in a courthouse length of criminal proceedings unjustified in camera trials EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-24986
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
ALBUL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
ALBUL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal/civil proceedings as well as the lack of effective remedy in this respect. Article 6 1 and 13 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55423
ALEKSEY MAKAROV v. Russia
ALEKSEY MAKAROV v. Russia RUS 12/09/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 10:16:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Various irregularities concerning pre trial detention and lack of effective remedy. Articles 5 and 13 Other violations: length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-23305
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ALEXOV v. Bulgaria
ALEXOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/08/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Poor detention conditions and/or restrictive penitentiary regimes applied in respect of the applicants lack of effective remedy and absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3639
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the Bulgarian authorities to effectively pursue adequate and timely actions to enforce the first and third applicants custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47553
ANGEL VASKOV ANGELOV v. Bulgaria
ANGEL VASKOV ANGELOV v. Bulgaria BGR 25/06/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Death or ill treatment under the responsibility of law enforcement agencies ineffective investigation into EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3701
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 01/09/2021 00:00:00 17/09/2021 10:48:18 Case Description: The case concerns the public screening at a museum from Bucharest of a movie portraying a same sex family organized by a Romanian association promoting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58377
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia ARM 30/03/2017 00:00:00 30/01/2018 15:07:59 Case Description: This group of four cases concerns the non enforcement or delayed enforcement of final domestic judgments adopted in favour of the applicants notably concerning property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46455
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania (no 1)
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania no 1 ROU 05/01/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Abuse suffered by the applicants or their relatives in police custody or upon arrest ineffectiveness of related criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17496