Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 243
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia ARM 15/09/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Ashot Harutynyan 34334/04 final on 15/09/2010 Jhangiryan 44765/08 final on 18/05/2021 Shirkhanyan 54547/16 final on 22/05/2022 Voskanyan 623/13 final on 24/01/2023 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-349
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private life: Supreme Court s failure to award to the applicants as victims of defamation a proportionate compensation for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6852
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALOGH AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
BALOGH AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 04/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: These cases concern proceedings for the restitution of land which had lasted 13 and 29 years respectively and were still ongoing. The European Court found that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51541
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BALTA AND DEMIR v. Turkey
BALTA AND DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 23/09/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction on the basis of a statement by an anonymous witness whom neither the applicants nor the trial court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37356
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 11/01/2017 00:00:00 26/04/2017 16:15:53 Case Description: This group concerns lengthy expropriation proceedings hindering the use of the property in question. Barcza: Violation of the right to protection of property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46703
BARSUKOVY v. Ukraine
BARSUKOVY v. Ukraine UKR 26/02/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:06:43 Case Description: Right to life/ action of security forces: Ineffective investigations into the deaths of the applicants relatives caused inter alia by road traffic accidents or in unclear EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-24743
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Protection of private life: Arbitrary interference due to the use of counter terrorism legislation by border control officers Schedule 7 Powers to stop and question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52217
BEIERE v. Latvia
BEIERE v. Latvia LVA 29/02/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure of domestic courts to offer in the context of criminal sufficient protection against an arbitrary detention in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12658
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BENKHARBOUCHE AND JANAH v. the United Kingdom
BENKHARBOUCHE AND JANAH v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the breaches acknowledged by the Government of the first applicant s housekeeper and cook at Sudanese Embassy in London rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61109
BERDZENISHVILI AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERDZENISHVILI AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 20/03/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 15:55:09 Case Description: These cases concern the arbitrary arrest detention and collective expulsion from the Russian Federation of Georgian nationals in autumn 2006. In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46587
BLACKGROVE v. the United Kingdom
BLACKGROVE v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/07/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of property and discrimination: Discriminatory treatment on grounds of gender between widows and widowers regarding social security benefits and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2909
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRUCZYNSKI v. Poland
BRUCZYNSKI v. Poland POL 04/02/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand without relevant and sufficient grounds and lack of enforceable right to compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18557