Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 121 - 140 of 334
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. Romania
IGNACCOLO ZENIDE v. Romania ROU 25/01/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Lacking protection of family life: failure to enforce a court decision based on the Hague Convention ordering that two children unlawfully abducted to Romania by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17375
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
IGOR SHEVCHENKO v. Ukraine
IGOR SHEVCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 04/06/2012 00:00:00 07/11/2016 11:56:43 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigations into the deaths of relatives caused inter alia by road traffic accidents illegal acts of private individuals and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-24504
IGRANOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
IGRANOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/10/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: This case concerns the failure to afford an opportunity for incarcerated applicants to attend court hearings in civil cases to which they were parties violation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50287
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
IONESCU VIRGIL v. Romania
IONESCU VIRGIL v. Romania ROU 28/09/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Unfair civil proceedings for adjustment of a debt established by a court decision and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16091
IOSUB CARAS v. Romania
IOSUB CARAS v. Romania ROU 11/12/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:15:02 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Authorities failure to properly implement the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17460
ISAAK v. Turkey
ISAAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37298
"IZA" LTD AND MAKRAKHIDZE v. Georgia
IZA LTD AND MAKRAKHIDZE v. Georgia GEO 27/12/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of property and lack of effective remedy: Failure of the State budgetary institutions to enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3335
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/04/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: This group concerns the failure within the Turkish legal framework to grant legal recognition to the Alevi faith 1 thus depriving its followers of the right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37402
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
JANKOVSKIS v. Lithuania
JANKOVSKIS v. Lithuania LTU 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Freedom of expression freedom to receive and impart information: Unjustified restriction by prison authorities of a detainee s access to an internet site providing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46741
K.J. v. Poland
K.J. v. Poland POL 01/06/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the applicants right to respect for family life on account of the authorities failure to facilitate reunion between the applicants and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20638
KAHRAMAN v. Turkey
KAHRAMAN v. Turkey TUR 31/01/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the applicants lack of access to classified documents furthermore in some cases also due to the non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37368
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KALUCZA v. Hungary
KALUCZA v. Hungary HUN 24/07/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to private life Article 8 on account of the authorities failure since 2005 to fulfil their positive obligation to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10977
KAMALIYEVY v. Russia
KAMALIYEVY v. Russia RUS 03/09/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right of individual petition on account of the first applicant s deportation to Uzbekistan in December 2007 for breach of residence regulations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13998
KAMINSKIENE v. Lithuania
KAMINSKIENE v. Lithuania LTU 12/01/2021 00:00:00 29/01/2021 19:13:35 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Objectively justified doubts concerning the impartiality of two judges in a Supreme Court selection panel with regard to the applicant s two EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56661