Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1681 - 1700 of 2198
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg LUX 25/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Searches conducted at the home and the workplace of a journalist and at the chambers of the his lawyer following the publication in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-109
ROLA v. Slovenia
ROLA v. Slovenia SVN 04/09/2019 00:00:00 16/09/2019 11:04:04 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference due to the revocation with permanent effect of the applicant s licence to act as a liquidator in insolvency proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52701
ROLAND DUMAS v. France
ROLAND DUMAS v. France FRA 15/10/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation following publication of a book in which a former defendant described his own trial. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32256
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF VRHBOSNA v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF VRHBOSNA v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 05/06/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to non enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49641
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
ROMANOV v. Russia
ROMANOV v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of impossibility to institute proceedings to contest paternity because when the applicant had obtained evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52459
ROMANOV v. Russia
ROMANOV v. Russia RUS 20/01/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of rights in detention and against ill treatment: Domestic court s refusal to allow the applicant to attend his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13561
ROMANOVA v. Ukraine
ROMANOVA v. Ukraine UKR 13/03/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of an impartial tribunal in proceedings brought following the dismissal from a post with a maintenance company of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31342
ROMET v. the Netherlands
ROMET v. the Netherlands NLD 14/05/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Interference with the right to respect for private life due to authorities failure to invalidate the applicant s stolen driving licence when reported leading to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4559
ROMEVA v. North Macedonia
ROMEVA v. North Macedonia MKD 12/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the Pension and Disability Fund s decision to discontinue payment of the applicant s retirement pension EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55031
ROMO v. France
ROMO v. France FRA 03/10/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32194
RONALD VERMEULEN v. Belgium
RONALD VERMEULEN v. Belgium BEL 17/10/2018 00:00:00 05/11/2018 16:01:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court resulting from the Conseil d tat s dismissal of the applicant s appeal due to its failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50711
ROOMAN v. Belgium
ROOMAN v. Belgium BEL 31/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:53:15 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of rights in detention: Failure to ensure a dangerous detainee s appropriate psychiatric care in a social protection facility due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51349
ROSCA v. the Republic of Moldova
ROSCA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 22/06/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 11:48:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice / protection of property: Denial of a fair hearing and unlawful interference with property as a result of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7526
ROSENZWEIG AND BONDED WAREHOUSES LTD. v. Poland
ROSENZWEIG AND BONDED WAREHOUSES LTD. v. Poland POL 30/11/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate control of property use due to the revocations without precise reason of an export permit and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18013
ROSSI AND NALDINI v. Italy
ROSSI AND NALDINI v. Italy ITA 11/03/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Impossibility for the applicants to obtain the assistance of the police to implement judicial decisions ordering their tenants eviction. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42659
ROSSLHUBER v. Austria
ROSSLHUBER v. Austria AUT 04/04/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-851
ROUSK v. Sweden
ROUSK v. Sweden SWE 25/10/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and to respect of his private and family life and his home due to the sale of his property at EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2164
ROZALIA AVRAM v. Romania
ROZALIA AVRAM v. Romania ROU 16/12/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: infringement of the principle of legal certainty on the ground that the domestic court of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13109
ROZSA v. Hungary
ROZSA v. Hungary HUN 28/07/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court s decisions resulting in the applicants inability to seek compensation in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10501