Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 321 - 340 of 480
OZERMAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
OZERMAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 20/01/2010 00:00:00 15/11/2016 17:34:29 Case Description: Unjustified interference with property: lack of compensation for expropriation of a plot partly considered as forest area and lack of effective remedy. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38670
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PADALOV v. Bulgaria
PADALOV v. Bulgaria BGR 10/11/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the refusal to grant free legal assistance resulting in a conviction. Article 6 1 3c EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14673
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The cases concern unjustified interference with the applicants right to freedom of expression as a result of civil defamation proceedings Article 49 of the Code of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37218
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: The case concerned the impossibility for the applicants fifty one Bulgarian nationals of Roma 1 ethnic origin to enjoy their private and family life and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62534
PAKSAS v. Lithuania
PAKSAS v. Lithuania LTU 06/01/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Electoral rights: Disproportionate restriction of the right to free elections due to the permanent and irreversible nature of the applicant s disqualification from standing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4324
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to irregularities in the conduct of search and seizure in the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31088
PAUDICIO v. Italy
PAUDICIO v. Italy ITA 12/11/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure by the authorities to comply with an order for the demolition of a building unlawfully built close to the applicant s home despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28224
PAULIK v. Slovakia
PAULIK v. Slovakia SVK 10/01/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of family life and discrimination: Impossibility to challenge one s paternity if it was established by a court decision discrimination compared with fathers whose EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8393
PAYKAR YEV HAGHTANAK LTD v. Armenia
PAYKAR YEV HAGHTANAK LTD v. Armenia ARM 02/06/2008 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the Court of Cassation s refusal to grant the applicant company s request EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-389
PERETYAKA v. Ukraine
PERETYAKA v. Ukraine UKR 20/06/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal of the High Administrative Court s to consider certain cassation appeals as being lodged out of time despite their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31218
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. Russia
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. Russia RUS 13/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure by the domestic authorities to protect the life of the applicants son suicide during his mandatory military service in 2003 2004 and to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13940
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
PINI AND BERTANI v. Romania
PINI AND BERTANI v. Romania ROU 22/09/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce two final court decisions by which two Italian couples had adopted two abandoned children who were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16213
PINKAS AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
PINKAS AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 30/01/2023 00:00:00 13/02/2023 14:31:45 Case Description: The case concerns the discrimination of the applicant judicial clerks on account of their unjustified difference in treatment by domestic courts vis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62651
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to introduce remedies that would provide the applicants with a reasonable opportunity to challenge the Bank of Slovenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59299
PIPER v. the United Kingdom
PIPER v. the United Kingdom GBR 21/07/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings to seize assets under the 1994 Drug Trafficking Act which allows the State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2794
PISARI v. Russia
PISARI v. Russia RUS 19/10/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the killing on 1 January 2012 of the applicants son by a Russian soldier from the peacekeeping force of the Joint Control Commission as a result of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14060
PLESO v. Hungary
PLESO v. Hungary HUN 02/01/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to liberty and security due to his compulsory confinement to a psychiatric hospital from 27 March 2008 to 25 April 2008 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11102
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia ARM 12/09/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Lack of effective remedy under Armenian law to apply for compensation for the non pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant in connection with his ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-459