Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 61 - 80 of 91
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. the United Kingdom
OTHMAN ABU QATADA v. the United Kingdom GBR 09/05/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice in the context of deportation on national security grounds: Due to a real risk of a flagrant denial of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2792
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
PENARANDA SOTO v. Malta
PENARANDA SOTO v. Malta MLT 19/03/2018 00:00:00 04/04/2018 15:18:40 Case Description: Right to individual petition: Unlawful monitoring by the prison authorities of the applicant s correspondence with the ECHR. Article 34 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49205
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 27/12/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of Article 8 due to: 1. the search and seizure in 1999 and in 2009 of privileged material at the applicants law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5962
PRODUKCIJA PLUS STORITVENO PODJETJE D.O.O. v. Slovenia
PRODUKCIJA PLUS STORITVENO PODJETJE D.O.O. v. Slovenia SVN 23/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:53:15 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant company s right to a fair trial on account of the fact that in 2013 the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51359
PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia
PROJECT TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia HRV 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns the unlawful interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions due to the cancellation and revocation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57449
PULATLI v. Turkey
PULATLI v. Turkey TUR 26/07/2011 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Unlawful detention on the basis of a disciplinary decision taken by the applicant s immediate military superior and not by an independent and impartial tribunal Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5648
RAMIREZ SANCHEZ v. France
RAMIREZ SANCHEZ v. France FRA 04/07/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Absence of an effective remedy to contest the measures extending the solitary confinement Article 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33213
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/11/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59085
RENOLDE v. France
RENOLDE v. France FRA 16/01/2009 00:00:00 13/10/2016 09:33:56 Case Description: Right to life and protection against torture of mentally disturbed prisoners: Failure of authorities to protect the right to life and/or against inhuman and degrading EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-21
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands NLD 24/10/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to render the decision to prolong the applicant s confinement to a secure institution within the time limit provided for by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4477
S.F. v. Switzerland
S.F. v. Switzerland CHE 30/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of police to prevent a suicide committed in an unusual way by a vulnerable detainee left unguarded in a police cell for forty minutes without paying EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56081
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. Turkey (no. 2)
SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 22/12/2020 00:00:00 18/01/2021 11:11:14 Case Description: The Selahattin Demirta No. 2 case concerns the arrest and pre trial detention of and criminal proceedings against the applicant a member of the National EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56539
SHAGIN v. Ukraine
SHAGIN v. Ukraine UKR 10/03/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Unfair criminal proceedings due to a lack of a public hearing and infringement of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31158
SHOYGO v. Ukraine
SHOYGO v. Ukraine UKR 30/09/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the lawfulness of detention pending deportation of the applicant who at the time lacked identity documents and the failure of the authorities to pursue the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58533
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece GRC 25/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: These cases concern ill treatment by law enforcement agents substantive violation of Article 3 in Konstantinopoulos and Others No. 2 and the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49397
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande ISL 30/05/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Absence of a possibility for the applicant company to have the imposition of a fine by the labour court reviewed. Article 2 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57
SILVESTER'S HORECA SERV v. Belgium
SILVESTER S HORECA SERV v. Belgium BEL 04/06/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the inability to have an administrative tax decision reviewed by a judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1413