Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 60 of 463
BARBIER v. France
BARBIER v. France FRA 17/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court as a result of the failure by the prison service to transmit a detainee s note to appeal in due EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33251
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 26/06/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention of the applicant due to the lack of clarity in the regulations governing situations in which different types of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3896
BASENKO v. Ukraine
BASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/02/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Ill treatment of the applicants by State agents a public transport employee and two volunteer citizen guards and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32270
BASU v. Germany
BASU v. Germany DEU 18/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to ascertain through an independent body that an effective investigation is carried out by the State authorities into the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62530
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal to consider the merits of the applicants claims and appeals due to a restrictive interpretation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6072
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BELLER v. Poland
BELLER v. Poland POL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and bodies violations of Article 6 1 . The case of Wcis o and Cabaj also concerns EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17662
BELVEDERE ALBERGHIERA SRL v. Italy
BELVEDERE ALBERGHIERA SRL v. Italy ITA 30/08/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Property rights: Resort to indirect expropriation a practice of emergency occupation of land by local administrative authorities pursuant to Law No. 85 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28192
BENDERSKIY v. Ukraine
BENDERSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial due to the domestic courts failure to consider an argument of substance advanced by the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31334
BERARU v. Romania
BERARU v. Romania ROU 08/09/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to an irregularity in the composition of the panel of the first instance court the limited access of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13312
BEREZA v. Ukraine
BEREZA v. Ukraine UKR 04/03/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Deprivation of liberty on account of the applicant s forcible escort to the police station by special force in order to be questioned as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56887
BEREZOVSKIYE v. Ukraine
BEREZOVSKIYE v. Ukraine UKR 07/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: This case concerns a breach of the applicants right of access to court as the Higher Administrative Court by refusing to examine their cassation appeal in 2007 penalised EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54149
BERTUZZI v. France
BERTUZZI v. France FRA 21/05/2003 00:00:00 24/07/2020 11:24:47 Case Description: This case concerns a violation in 1995 of the applicant s right of access to a tribunal to claim for damages against a lawyer whom he considered not to have represented him EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55683
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
BETTERIDGE v. the United Kingdom
BETTERIDGE v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/04/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unreasonable delay in the Parole Board review of the applicant s eligibility for release following the expiry of his tariff EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2949
BHANDARI v. the United Kingdom
BHANDARI v. the United Kingdom GBR 31/03/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before the High Court of the Isle of Man. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2808
BIAO v. Denmark
BIAO v. Denmark DNK 24/05/2016 00:00:00 12/10/2016 18:12:08 Case Description: Discrimination: Refusal of the applicants request for spousal reunification without compelling or weighty reasons in comparison to the more favourable conditions for family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17
BIRZIETIS v. Lithuania
BIRZIETIS v. Lithuania LTU 14/09/2016 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:11:49 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unjustified interference due to the authorities refusal to allow a detainee to grow a beard while he was serving a prison sentence due to an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26454
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 10/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to provide sufficient reasons to justify the administrative detention in 2014 for five months and twenty days of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50019