Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 241 - 260 of 339
PUNZELT v. the Czech Republic
PUNZELT v. the Czech Republic CZE 25/07/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of detention on remand and of criminal proceedings. Articles EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6050
QUINN v. the United Kingdom
QUINN v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/04/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to denial of access to legal advice during the first 24 to 48 hours of detention in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2398
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania ROU 12/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58659
R.E. v. the United Kingdom
R.E. v. the United Kingdom GBR 27/01/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Covert surveillance of a detainee s consultations with his lawyer and the person appointed to assist him as a vulnerable person following EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2975
R.R. AND OTHERS v. Hungary
R.R. AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Right to life: Authorities failure to adequately protect the right to life of members of a witness protection scheme on account of their exclusion from it without any EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10535
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia SVK 01/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations related to excessive use of force by the police failure to protect physical well being of persons in police custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56501
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
RAKEVICH v. Russia
RAKEVICH v. Russia RUS 24/03/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of appropriate legal safeguards in incapacitation proceedings and concerning psychiatric hospitalisation in particular due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13555
RAZA v. Bulgaria
RAZA v. Bulgaria BGR 11/05/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention pending expulsion and deportation and of family life: Shortcomings of the judicial review in respect of foreign nationals expulsion on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1928
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/11/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59085
RIZZOTTO v. Italy (no. 2)
RIZZOTTO v. Italy no. 2 ITA 05/12/2019 00:00:00 17/12/2019 16:24:16 Case Description: The case concerns the procedural safeguards aimed at guaranteeing an effective judicial review of the lawfulness of a pre trial detention order for a suspected person EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54441
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
ROSTOMASHVILI v. Georgia
ROSTOMASHVILI v. Georgia GEO 08/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: These cases concern unfair criminal proceedings and trial against the applicants. In particular the Rostomashvili case concerns the failure by the authorities to give EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51447
ROTARU v. Romania
ROTARU v. Romania ROU 04/05/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Insufficient safeguards against arbitrary in the processing of personal data: interference with the applicant s right to private life owing to the storage and public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15963
RUSU v. Austria
RUSU v. Austria AUT 02/01/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arrest and detention pending expulsion by the Austrian border police of a Romanian national attempting to return to Romania from Spain on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1053
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 20/01/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns an unlawful and disproportionate interference with the applicant s property rights because of the impossibility to obtain in kind the plot of land granted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31598
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to ensure the effectiveness of available procedural safeguards and to act with appropriate due diligence in managing and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48329
SÄRGAVA v. Estonia
S RGAVA v. Estonia EST 16/02/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of sufficient procedural safeguards to protect privileged data during the seizure and the subsequent examination of a lawyer s laptop and mobile EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59837
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744