Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 261 - 280 of 339
SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia
SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/01/2016 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal by domestic courts to examine a claim against the Presidential Decree terminating the applicant s term of office EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-453
SALIH SALMAN KILIC v. Turkey
SALIH SALMAN KILIC v. Turkey TUR 05/06/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: delayed examination of the lawfulness of the applicant s arrest and detention in Denizli Prison as he could not be brought before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37198
SASO GORGIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
SASO GORGIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 19/07/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of authorities to protect the applicant against a uniformed police reservist who on unauthorised leave of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6660
SCOPPOLA v. Italy (No. 2)
SCOPPOLA v. Italy No. 2 ITA 17/09/2009 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: No punishment without law and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to allow to benefit from the application of a more lenient criminal law which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45130
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine UKR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:42:52 Case Description: The case concerns an interference with the journalist s right to the protection of her sources in 2018 due to judicially authorised access to her mobile telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58305
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the unlawful interference with the applicants right to respect for their correspondence with various official bodies and institutions both while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31112
SEYCHELL v. Malta
SEYCHELL v. Malta MLT 28/11/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: No punishment without law: Failure of the legal provisions to satisfy the foreseeability requirement and lack of effective safeguards against arbitrary punishment due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50925
SHALIMOV v. Ukraine
SHALIMOV v. Ukraine UKR 04/06/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicants right to respect for their family life because of the authorities refusals to allow family visits during their detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31108
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 21/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: The case concerns the collective expulsion by Italy to Greece of four migrants intercepted as stowaways on ferries arriving in the port of Ancona between January EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15559
SHCHOKIN v. Ukraine
SHCHOKIN v. Ukraine UKR 03/01/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the death of the applicant s son in a penitentiary colony in October 2000 his ill treatment before his death by co prisoners and probably by a prison guard EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31359
SHISHKOVI v. Bulgaria
SHISHKOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 25/06/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Ineffective investigations into allegations of ill treatment by law enforcement agents due inter alia to their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4019
SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 21/04/2021 00:00:00 11/05/2021 15:56:40 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns multiple violations during the Maidan protests in Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine in 2013 2014 either by State or by non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57585
SHORAZOVA v. Malta
SHORAZOVA v. Malta MLT 03/06/2022 00:00:00 16/06/2022 18:27:39 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of procedural safeguards for the freezing of all applicant s property in Malta between 2014 and 2021 at legal assistance request of Kazakh EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60589
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine UKR 30/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:26:32 Case Description: The Shvydka case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to her conviction and sentence to ten days detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37062
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece GRC 25/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: These cases concern ill treatment by law enforcement agents substantive violation of Article 3 in Konstantinopoulos and Others No. 2 and the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49397
SMIRNOV v. Russia
SMIRNOV v. Russia RUS 12/11/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns searches in the framework of the criminal investigation without sufficient and relevant grounds or safeguards against interference with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13579
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 22/05/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deaths life threatening injuries or ill treatment during arrest and other law enforcement operations. The facts occurred between 2000 and 2009. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12812
SOCIEDAD ANONIMA DEL UCIEZA v. Spain
SOCIEDAD ANONIMA DEL UCIEZA v. Spain ESP 23/03/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection of property and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference with property rights due to the arbitrary and barely EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5758
SOCIETE COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. France
SOCIETE COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. France FRA 16/07/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Unjustified interference due to the applicant company s premises having been searched and documents seized as part of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33135
SOLSKA AND RYBICKA v. Poland
SOLSKA AND RYBICKA v. Poland POL 20/12/2018 00:00:00 16/01/2019 17:03:19 Case Description: Lack of sufficient safeguards against arbitrariness with regard to a prosecutorial decision of 2018 ordering the exhumation of the applicants relatives to which the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51179