Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 22
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private life: Supreme Court s failure to award to the applicants as victims of defamation a proportionate compensation for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6852
BREMNER v. Turkey
BREMNER v. Turkey TUR 13/01/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:23:31 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of domestic courts to protect the right to one s own image in the context of the broadcasting of a television documentary on religious EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36713
BRISC v. Romania
BRISC v. Romania ROU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 15:10:37 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s reprimand and consequent removal from the office of chief prosecutor in 2009 as a result of a disciplinary action instituted him on charges EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51829
CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. Italy
CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. Italy ITA 07/06/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Freedom of expression in particular to impart information: Failure to put in place an appropriate legislative and administrative framework to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28280
FEILAZOO v. Malta
FEILAZOO v. Malta MLT 11/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns the inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention pending deportation in the periods from 16 to 23 May 2019 and from 15 September 2019 to 13 November EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57955
FOGLIA v. Switzerland
FOGLIA v. Switzerland CHE 13/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the conviction of a practicing lawyer to a disciplinary fine on the basis of declarations made in the press and on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4732
FUENTES BOBO v. Spain
FUENTES BOBO v. Spain ESP 29/05/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference in the context of a labour dispute due to the dismissal of a television producer by the State television company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3475
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the non motivated refusal of the competent authority the National Radio and Television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3829
KATRAMI v. Greece
KATRAMI v. Greece GRC 06/03/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to the criminal convictions imposed on them for insult Article 361 Criminal Code defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15699
MAMERE v. France
MAMERE v. France FRA 07/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction of a politician in criminal proceedings to pay a fine as well as damages for statements he made during a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33029
MANOLE AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
MANOLE AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 17/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This case concerns undue interferences with the right of freedom of expression of journalists editors and producers working at the state television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6752
MATUZ v. Hungary
MATUZ v. Hungary HUN 21/01/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of a journalist s dismissal from the State television company for publishing a book criticising his employer in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10987
MILJEVIC v. Croatia
MILJEVIC v. Croatia HRV 25/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to convictions imposed in 2009 2012 for defamation Article 200 of the Criminal Code EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56053
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia ARM 17/08/2022 00:00:00 02/09/2022 10:09:44 Case Description: This case concerns an aggressive homophobic campaign against the applicant a well known member of the lesbian gay bisexual and transgender LGBT community in Armenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60993
PECK v. the United Kingdom
PECK v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/04/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and lack of effective remedy: Disclosure in the media by a local council of an individual s photographs taken by a CCTV camera installed in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2236
RODINA v. Latvia
RODINA v. Latvia LVA 14/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the publication of the first applicant s family story in the newspaper and its subsequent broadcast EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55791
RTBF v. Belgium
RTBF v. Belgium BEL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the lack of a predictable legal framework as well as clear and constant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1209
SIC - SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICAÇÃO v. Portugal
SIC SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICA O v. Portugal PRT 02/11/2021 00:00:00 19/11/2021 15:34:10 Case Description: The case concerns a disproportionate civil defamation judgment against a media firm in respect of television reports on a network of child EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58871
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria AUT 19/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal to allow the applicant company to set up and operate a television transmitter. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-843
TV VEST AS & ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. Norway
TV VEST AS ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. Norway NOR 11/03/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Imposition of a fine on a television broadcasting company and a political party by the State Media Authority for breaching EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-203