Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 481 - 500 of 540
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia RUS 17/07/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly the applicants degrading treatment violations of Article 3 in different periods from 2007 to 2017 on account of their confinement in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14144
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
T.K. v. Lithuania
T.K. v. Lithuania LTU 03/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and functioning of justice: Unfair trial on the grounds of the applicant s inability to examine key witnesses in particular his partner in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50985
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TARAKHEL v. Switzerland
TARAKHEL v. Switzerland CHE 04/11/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:13:37 Case Description: Risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 in case of an Afghan asylum seeking family s return to Italy under Dublin II Regulation without the authorities having first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5920
TARARIYEVA v. Russia
TARARIYEVA v. Russia RUS 14/03/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Authorities failure to protect the right to life of the applicant s son due to the lack of adequate medical care in prison and defective medical assistance at a public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13715
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice / Protection of private life: Failure to protect the applicants from private activities producing a dangerous effects EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37302
TEODOR v. Romania
TEODOR v. Romania ROU 07/10/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Incompatibility with presumption of innocence: Reasoning of civil courts dismissing two civil actions brought by the applicant against his former employer was based to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17584
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
TIMOFEYEV v. Russia
TIMOFEYEV v. Russia RUS 23/01/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice/Protection of property/Effective remedy: Non enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning the State s monetary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27520
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703
TOMA v. Romania
TOMA v. Romania ROU 24/05/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Ill treatment in police custody and lack of an effective investigation delay in bringing the applicant before a judge and lack of a speedy judicial review following his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16421
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 15:06:12 Case Description: These cases concern a structural problem highlighted by the European Court applying the pilot judgment procedure of inhuman and degrading treatment caused by the poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52617
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
TRAPANI v. Italy
TRAPANI v. Italy ITA 12/01/2001 00:00:00 16/11/2016 16:06:29 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and 8 in the case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39202
TRITSIS v. Greece
TRITSIS v. Greece GRC 10/09/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Rejection by the Council of State of the applicant s joint application with two other persons on the grounds of divergent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22678
TROIANI v. Italy
TROIANI v. Italy ITA 10/07/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of disciplinary proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43597
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
TURKIYE IS BANKASI v. Finland
TURKIYE IS BANKASI v. Finland FIN 18/09/2002 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings in particular before the Court of Appeal of Helsinki. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4780