Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 54 of 54
OGNEVENKO v. Russia
OGNEVENKO v. Russia RUS 06/05/2019 00:00:00 01/07/2019 15:02:08 Case Description: Violation of the right to freedom of association on account of dismissal of train driver following his participation in strike due to blanket ban on strike for certain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52349
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: In the present case the Court found violations of Articles 5 1 and 8 of the Convention on account of the extra legal transfer of all five applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52803
PALUSHI v. Austria
PALUSHI v. Austria AUT 22/03/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in prison: Ill treatment in detention awaiting expulsion established by medical reports and placement in solitary confinement despite hunger EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-483
ROMANOWSKI v. Poland
ROMANOWSKI v. Poland POL 12/01/2023 00:00:00 20/01/2023 18:00:32 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate infringement of the applicant s right to private life due to the failure to strike a fair balance between his rights and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62384
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan AZE 16/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: The case concerns a refugee of Armenian origin who was forced to flee from his home during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1717
SIERPINSKI v. Poland
SIERPINSKI v. Poland POL 03/02/2010 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of property: Refusal to pay compensation for a property unlawfully expropriated in 1967 based the domestic courts view that the applicant s claims for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39919
URCAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
URCAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 17/10/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicants right to freedom of association as a result of their conviction for having participated in union meetings without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37166
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
VENOT v. France
VENOT v. France FRA 17/09/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:01:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court on account of the decision of the President of the Court de cassation under a specific provision of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31950
VOD BAUR IMPEX S.R.L. v. Romania
VOD BAUR IMPEX S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 26/07/2022 00:00:00 19/08/2022 09:42:37 Case Description: This case concerns the domestic courts failure to strike a fair balance between competing interests due to the rigid manner of adjudicating the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60963
WERRA NATURSTEIN GMBH & CO KG v. Germany
WERRA NATURSTEIN GMBH CO KG v. Germany DEU 19/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Violation of the right to protection of property on account of the total lack of compensation as regards the applicant company s mining licence and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46759
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447
YUKSELLER LTD. STI. v. Turkey
YUKSELLER LTD. STI. v. Turkey TUR 19/01/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s de facto expropriation without adequate compensation and domestic courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56857