Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 241 - 260 of 354
NIEDBALA v. Poland
NIEDBALA v. Poland POL 04/07/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and protection of private life: Detention on remand ordered by public prosecutor not offering sufficient guarantees of independence without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17773
NIKOLOUDAKIS v. Greece
NIKOLOUDAKIS v. Greece GRC 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicants right of acess to a court on account of the authorities failure between 1998 and 2011 to give effect to civil and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55717
NIKOLOVA AND VANDOVA v. Bulgaria
NIKOLOVA AND VANDOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 17/03/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of a public hearing in proceedings before the Supreme Administrative Court which unfolded between 2002 and 2003 and concerned the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3861
NURMAGOMEDOV v. Russia
NURMAGOMEDOV v. Russia RUS 07/09/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Right to individual petition: Interference due to the prison authorities refusal to forward a detainee s letter to the European Court. Article 34 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27628
O'DONOGHUE AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
O DONOGHUE AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 14/03/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to marry and discrimination: Interference with the right to marry due to the application of a scheme requesting state approval for marriages to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2228
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Structural problem highlighted by the Court applying the pilot judgment procedure: violations of the applicants right of access to a court and right to peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7092
OOO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO TAMBOV-INFORM v. Russia
OOO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO TAMBOV INFORM v. Russia RUS 18/08/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified administrative conviction of the applicant company in 2012 in several separate sets of proceedings for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58325
OSMANYAN AND AMIRAGHYAN v. Armenia
OSMANYAN AND AMIRAGHYAN v. Armenia ARM 11/01/2019 00:00:00 27/02/2019 14:15:25 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference on account of the expropriation of land for mining without addressing the issue of whether the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51635
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria AUT 07/03/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation under Section 111 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with section 33 of Media Act and prohibition to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1055
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
PACULA v. Latvia
PACULA v. Latvia LVA 15/12/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of correspondence: Conviction based on a witness statements without opportunity to question them at the hearing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31208
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PASQUINI v. San Marino (no. 2)
PASQUINI v. San Marino no. 2 SMR 08/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to the presumption of innocence. Even though the criminal proceedings against the applicant on charges of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57159
PATOUX v. France
PATOUX v. France FRA 14/07/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to conduct a speedy review of the lawfulness of a detention as it took the civil judge 46 days to decide on the request for immediate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33289
PAVLETIC v. Slovakia
PAVLETIC v. Slovakia SVK 10/11/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention delay in the ruling on a request for release no decision had been delivered and lack enforceable right to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7831
PELTEREAU-VILLENEUVE v. Switzerland
PELTEREAU VILLENEUVE v. Switzerland CHE 28/01/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence on account of terms used by the prosecutor in his decision to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5870
PERKOV v. Croatia
PERKOV v. Croatia HRV 20/12/2022 00:00:00 09/01/2023 11:53:24 Case Description: This case concerns ineffective investigations by the prison administration and prosecutors between 2015 and 2016 into the applicant s alleged ill treatment by prison guards EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62262
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PILAGS v. Latvia
PILAGS v. Latvia LVA 03/03/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: The present case concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial as the domestic courts did not properly examine the applicant s allegations of incitement in the administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59813
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia ARM 12/09/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Lack of effective remedy under Armenian law to apply for compensation for the non pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant in connection with his ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-459