Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 44
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 01/09/2021 00:00:00 17/09/2021 10:48:18 Case Description: The case concerns the public screening at a museum from Bucharest of a movie portraying a same sex family organized by a Romanian association promoting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58377
BELOZOROV v. Russia
BELOZOROV v. Russia RUS 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55229
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14094
BIASETTI v. Italy
BIASETTI v. Italy ITA 01/03/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand. Article 5 4 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: No claim EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45116
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine UKR 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The group of cases concerns the disproportionate refusal of the authorities at different periods between 2005 2014 to provide an NGO and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55745
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
D.A. AND OTHERS v. Italy
D.A. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 04/07/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of civil proceedings brought by the applicants or their deceased relatives seeking compensation for the damage they EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28310
ERDEM v. Germany
ERDEM v. Germany DEU 05/10/2001 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: No claim EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38336
GLOR v. Switzerland
GLOR v. Switzerland CHE 06/11/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant on the ground of his disability being required to pay a tax for exemption from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5842
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
KHANAMIROVA v. Russia
KHANAMIROVA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns non enforcement of judicial decisions concerning child custody and contact rights violation of Article 8 . While the majority of the cases in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14034
KHAYLO v. Ukraine
KHAYLO v. Ukraine UKR 13/02/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: These cases concern procedural violations of Article 2 of the Convention on account of the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants relatives caused EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33459
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland POL 02/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive use of force by the Police during the applicants arrest in February 2015 and ineffective investigation in the circumstances of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59191
KUOPILA v. Finland
KUOPILA v. Finland FIN 27/07/2000 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms on the ground that material submitted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4800
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213