Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 721 - 740 of 935
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg LUX 25/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Searches conducted at the home and the workplace of a journalist and at the chambers of the his lawyer following the publication in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-109
ROLAND DUMAS v. France
ROLAND DUMAS v. France FRA 15/10/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation following publication of a book in which a former defendant described his own trial. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32256
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
ROMANOWSKI v. Poland
ROMANOWSKI v. Poland POL 12/01/2023 00:00:00 20/01/2023 18:00:32 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate infringement of the applicant s right to private life due to the failure to strike a fair balance between his rights and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62384
ROSTOMASHVILI v. Georgia
ROSTOMASHVILI v. Georgia GEO 08/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: These cases concern unfair criminal proceedings and trial against the applicants. In particular the Rostomashvili case concerns the failure by the authorities to give EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51447
ROSTOVTSEV v. Ukraine
ROSTOVTSEV v. Ukraine UKR 25/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Right to appeal in criminal matters: Refusal owing to the unforeseeable application of certain rules of criminal procedure of the applicant s request for leave to appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48169
ROTH v. Germany
ROTH v. Germany DEU 22/01/2021 00:00:00 15/02/2021 16:49:34 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s degrading treatment on account of eleven intrusive strip searches he was subjected to in 2014 2017 prior to or after receiving visitors in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56713
ROWE AND DAVIS v. the United Kingdom
ROWE AND DAVIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/02/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to non disclosure by prosecution of relevant evidence on the ground of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2480
RTBF v. Belgium
RTBF v. Belgium BEL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the lack of a predictable legal framework as well as clear and constant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1209
RUPA AND TOMPI v. Romania
RUPA AND TOMPI v. Romania ROU 02/05/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to provide pertinent and sufficient reasons to justify extending the 15 years old first applicant s pre trial detention. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46753
RUSISHVILI v. Georgia
RUSISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 30/09/2022 00:00:00 18/10/2022 14:54:25 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial on account of the lack of sufficient reasoning in the domestic court s decision of 2012 dismissing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61453
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands NLD 24/10/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to render the decision to prolong the applicant s confinement to a secure institution within the time limit provided for by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4477
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia RUS 07/07/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of public access to the reasoning of judicial decisions in civil and criminal matters between 2001 and 2009 as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13659
RYBACKI v. Poland
RYBACKI v. Poland POL 13/04/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of detention on remand as the grounds for prolonging detention were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17989
RYSER v. Switzerland
RYSER v. Switzerland CHE 12/04/2021 00:00:00 11/05/2021 15:56:40 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment and disproportionate interference on account of the applicant s obligation to pay a tax for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57577
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 20/01/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns an unlawful and disproportionate interference with the applicant s property rights because of the impossibility to obtain in kind the plot of land granted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31598
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/09/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Automatic pre trial detention under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and the lack of availability of an enforceable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2568
S.C. BRITANIC WORLD S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. BRITANIC WORLD S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 12/09/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of legal certainty on account of the revision of a final county court judgment by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12718
S.C. IMH SUCEAVA S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. IMH SUCEAVA S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 29/01/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial: Different decisions without sufficient reasons by two domestic courts as to the validity and reliability of the same piece of evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17552