Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 2361 - 2380 of 2466
WESOLEK v. Poland
WESOLEK v. Poland POL 13/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court on account of the refusal of the applicant s request for full exemption from court fees to challenge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52320
WETTSTEIN v. Switzerland
WETTSTEIN v. Switzerland CHE 21/03/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the lack of impartiality of the cantonal administrative court as two part time judges had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4682
WIESER AND BICOS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH v. Austria
WIESER AND BICOS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH v. Austria AUT 16/01/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unlawful search and seizure of electronic data in a lawyer s owner and general manager of a limited liability EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1013
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979
WITEK v. Poland
WITEK v. Poland POL 11/04/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful placement in a psychiatric hospital on the basis of an expert opinion delayed ordering and examination by the district court of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19105
WITKOWSKI v. Poland
WITKOWSKI v. Poland POL 13/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the applicant s inability to appeal against a judgment given against him by the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51865
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland POL 04/04/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention in a sobering up centre. Article 5 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17757
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland POL 05/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the criminal conviction of a chief editor and co owner of a local newspaper for the publication of an interview EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20600
WLOCH v. Poland (no. 2)
WLOCH v. Poland no. 2 POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Refusal of a domestic court to grant compensation under the relevant provisions for the applicant s unlawful detention on remand. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39929
WODITSCHKA v. Austria
WODITSCHKA v. Austria AUT 21/01/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / discrimination on the ground of sex: Discriminatory treatment of a male homosexual sentenced to a fine or a suspended prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-985
WOJCIECHOWSKI v. Poland
WOJCIECHOWSKI v. Poland POL 05/06/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and efficient functioning of justice: Disregard of presumption of innocence due to the grounds used by courts to motivate decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18649
WOJTAS-KALETA v. Poland
WOJTAS KALETA v. Poland POL 16/10/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Reprimand of a journalist by her employer Polish Public TV for having expressed in an interview and in an open letter her concerns about inter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18347
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland POL 12/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: Conditions of detention / Protection against ill treatment: Inadequate prison conditions in Siedlce Prison in an overcrowded cells. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50023
WOMEN ON WAVES AND OTHERS v. Portugal
WOMEN ON WAVES AND OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 03/05/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the decision of the administrative authorities to prohibit the ship Borndiep which had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9671
WORWA v. Poland
WORWA v. Poland POL 14/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unjustified interference due to the circumstances in which the applicant became subject to a series of psychiatric reports in criminal proceedings. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17755
WOS v. Poland
WOS v. Poland POL 08/09/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of judicial review of decisions taken by the Polish German Reconciliation Foundation on the claims to compensate victims of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18441
X AND Y v. Croatia
X AND Y v. Croatia HRV 03/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Denial of a fair hearing due to lack of procedural safeguards in proceedings divesting the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10109
X v. Croatia
X v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Exclusion of the applicants in the case of X the applicant was divested of her capacity to act while in the case of A.K. and L. the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10089
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia LVA 26/11/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Failure to satisfy the procedural requirements inherent in the right to respect for private life due to refusal by domestic courts to examine the conclusions of a psychological EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31110