Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 421 - 440 of 836
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KOLU v. Turkey
KOLU v. Turkey TUR 02/11/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicants convictions on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37214
KONOVALOVA v. Russia
KONOVALOVA v. Russia RUS 16/02/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful presence of medical students during the birth of the applicant s child resulting from the lack of sufficient procedural safeguards in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27896
KOPIC v. Croatia
KOPIC v. Croatia HRV 29/09/2022 00:00:00 29/09/2022 16:50:16 Case Description: This case concerns degrading treatment of the applicant on account of inadequate conditions of his detention due to overcrowding in Lepoglava State Prison in 2007 2012 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61299
KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. Estonia
KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. Estonia EST 28/06/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:41:35 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment due to the excessive use of force by law enforcement officers and lack of an effective and independent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37428
KOROSTYLYOV v. Ukraine
KOROSTYLYOV v. Ukraine UKR 13/09/2013 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Right to individual petition: Refusal by the authorities to provide prisoners with effective access to the documents in their criminal files needed to substantiate their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25283
KOROVINY v. Russia
KOROVINY v. Russia RUS 27/05/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of Article 3 on account of the poor material conditions of the first applicant s confinement in 2010 2012 in the Kazan Specialist Psychiatric Hospital under EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14058
KOTELNIKOV v. Russia
KOTELNIKOV v. Russia RUS 12/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Violation of the right to life on account of lack of effective investigation into the deaths or injuries caused by illegal acts of private individuals car accidents in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39467
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KOVYAZIN v. Russia
KOVYAZIN v. Russia RUS 29/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Confinement of the applicants in a metal cage in the courtroom during criminal proceedings against them. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49655
KRAULAIDIS v. Lithuania
KRAULAIDIS v. Lithuania LTU 08/02/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 11:52:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ineffectiveness of the pre trial investigation into the circumstances of a traffic accident which had left the applicant disabled of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46129
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine UKR 06/12/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns a number of substantial and procedural violations of the applicant s rights under Article 3 while detained on remand at the Kharkiv Regional Pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31583
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland POL 02/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive use of force by the Police during the applicants arrest in February 2015 and ineffective investigation in the circumstances of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59191
KUIMOV v. Russia
KUIMOV v. Russia RUS 08/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities failure to justify severe restrictions on the applicant s access to her adoptive child during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13839
KUMMER v. the Czech Republic
KUMMER v. the Czech Republic CZE 25/10/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Degrading treatment in police custody due to unjustified use of restraints lack of effective investigations thereof Status of Execution: The just satisfaction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6436
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
KUTTNER v. Austria
KUTTNER v. Austria AUT 16/10/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Delay in dealing with an application for release from an institution for mentally ill offenders in order to serve the sentence in an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-495
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
KYRIACOU TSIAKKOURMAS AND OTHERS v. Turkey
KYRIACOU TSIAKKOURMAS AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 02/09/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: The case concerns the lack of an effective investigation by the authorities of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus TRNC into the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37078
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213