Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 801 - 820 of 836
WIKTORKO v. Poland
WIKTORKO v. Poland POL 30/06/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Ill treatment in a sobering up centre and lack of an effective investigation Status of Execution: Reopening of investigation impossible due to prescription. In 2001 the 1982 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18273
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 11/09/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex on the ground that social benefits for widowed parents were only available EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2550
WODITSCHKA v. Austria
WODITSCHKA v. Austria AUT 21/01/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / discrimination on the ground of sex: Discriminatory treatment of a male homosexual sentenced to a fine or a suspended prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-985
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland POL 12/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: Conditions of detention / Protection against ill treatment: Inadequate prison conditions in Siedlce Prison in an overcrowded cells. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50023
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447
X AND OTHERS v. Austria
X AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 19/02/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:13:33 Case Description: Discriminatory treatment of unmarried same sex couples: legal impossibility of second parent adoption in unmarried same sex couples i.e. without severing the links with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1187
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Sweden
X v. Sweden SWE 09/04/2018 00:00:00 02/05/2018 10:26:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation ordered by the Migration Agency and confirmed by the Migration Court to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49349
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CHE 26/04/2017 00:00:00 19/06/2017 16:05:34 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / deportation/asylum: Failure of authorities to sufficiently assess in asylum proceedings the risk of ill treatment if returned to Sri Lanka EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46933
X v. Turkey
X v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection against discrimination / protection against ill treatment: Sustained discrimination and inhuman and degrading treatment on account of the homosexual applicant s detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37196
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
Y.P. AND L.P. v. France
Y.P. AND L.P. v. France FRA 21/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment in case of deportation to Belarus. Status of Execution: The applicants received a receipt for their residence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33059
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YANKOV v. Bulgaria
YANKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/03/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of rights in detention: Shaving of a detainee s head disciplinary punishment for insulting officials in the draft manuscript of a book EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14291
YAROSLAV BELOUSOV v. Russia
YAROSLAV BELOUSOV v. Russia RUS 06/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of Article 3 ill treatment on account of overcrowding in a courtroom glass cabin Yaroslav Belousov and Akimenkov and a violation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46347
YASAR v. Turkey
YASAR v. Turkey TUR 24/04/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / functioning of justice: Ineffectiveness of investigations and criminal prosecutions in relation to ill treatment allegedly inflicted by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36746
YAVAS v. Turkey
YAVAS v. Turkey TUR 18/12/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 17:24:27 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment /access to and efficient functioning of justice: Ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36275
YAZGUL YILMAZ v. Turkey
YAZGUL YILMAZ v. Turkey TUR 01/05/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right not to be subjected to degrading treatment on account of gynaecological examination of the applicant a minor at the time while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37290
YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. Bulgaria
YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. Bulgaria BGR 11/08/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: This case concerns the exclusion in 2013 2014 from a monthly allowance of a single mother of children of an unknown father which allowance is normally provided to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58331
YOH-EKALE MWANJE v. Belgium
YOH EKALE MWANJE v. Belgium BEL 20/03/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection against inhuman treatment against expulsion and lack of effective remedy: Inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by a Cameroonian national an illegal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1543