Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 841 - 860 of 966
SVENCIONIENE v. Lithuania
SVENCIONIENE v. Lithuania LTU 25/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to inability to attend an appeal hearing in divorce proceedings due to clerical error. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4271
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31302
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/06/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of criminal Stoine Hristov no. 2 and civil Svetlozar Petrov proceedings violations of Articles 6 1 1 before the most EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3731
SVETOSLAV DIMITROV v. Bulgaria
SVETOSLAV DIMITROV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/05/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the unlawful detention of the applicant due to the lack of clarity in the regulations governing situations in which different types of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3789
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia RUS 17/07/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly the applicants degrading treatment violations of Article 3 in different periods from 2007 to 2017 on account of their confinement in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14144
SVIPSTA v. Latvia
SVIPSTA v. Latvia LVA 09/06/2006 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12622
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
SZEPESI v. Hungary
SZEPESI v. Hungary HUN 21/03/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand due to period of inactivity irreconcilable with the requisite special diligence . Article 5 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11344
SZUCS v. Austria
SZUCS v. Austria AUT 24/11/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial in compensation proceedings for the applicants detention on remand following the discontinuance of or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-733
T.K. v. Lithuania
T.K. v. Lithuania LTU 03/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and functioning of justice: Unfair trial on the grounds of the applicant s inability to examine key witnesses in particular his partner in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50985
T. v. the United Kingdom
T. v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/12/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Denial of a fair trial due to the applicants inability minors aged 10 at the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2452
TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. Russia
TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This group of cases Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of the Jehovah s Witnesses. The case of Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61031
TALEVSKA AND TRPCHESKA v. North Macedonia
TALEVSKA AND TRPCHESKA v. North Macedonia MKD 28/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the Bitola Court of Appeal to communicate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60723
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TAMER TANRIKULU v. Turkey
TAMER TANRIKULU v. Turkey TUR 29/11/2016 00:00:00 12/12/2016 17:18:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of the refusal of the Supreme Military Administrative Court to allow the applicant to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45565
TANASE AND OTHERS v. Romania
TANASE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 26/08/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Destruction of Roma homes : resulting in living conditions contrary to Article 3 lack of an effective remedy discrimination lack of a fair trial within a reasonable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17381
TANAY v. Turkey
TANAY v. Turkey TUR 09/03/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial regarding the increase of compensation in an expropriation procedure: Court of Cassation s unreasoned decision holding against applicable provisions that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5626
TANDOGAN v. Turkey
TANDOGAN v. Turkey TUR 13/07/2021 00:00:00 15/07/2021 10:21:13 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of right to a fair trial on account of the lack of legal assistance while in police custody as a result of the statutory ban applicable to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58143
TANISMA v. Turkey
TANISMA v. Turkey TUR 02/05/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due on account of the presence of two military officers on the bench of the Supreme Military Administrative Court. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37242
TARASOV v. Ukraine
TARASOV v. Ukraine UKR 31/01/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to participate effectively in his trial in December 2001: the Court held that he had been forced to appear before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31120