Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 103
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine UKR 30/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:26:32 Case Description: The Shvydka case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to her conviction and sentence to ten days detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37062
SISSANIS v. Romania
SISSANIS v. Romania ROU 25/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Unlawful or disproportionate prohibition to leave the country or the city in the framework of criminal proceedings. Article 2 2 of Protocol No. 4 Access EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16331
SOSINOWSKA v. Poland
SOSINOWSKA v. Poland POL 18/01/2012 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with freedom of expression: Conviction of a doctor in disciplinary proceedings for criticising her superior on the basis of the Code of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39933
STANISLAV ZHUKOV v. Russia
STANISLAV ZHUKOV v. Russia RUS 12/01/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of equality of arms due to failure to summon convicted persons and their counsel in criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13547
STATILEO v. Croatia
STATILEO v. Croatia HRV 10/10/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property between 1997 and 2015 on account of statutory limitations on the use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12093
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal PRT 04/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the lack of a remedy to challenge one s placement in security cells which had a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9695
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 30/11/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The violations found in the 16 judgments currently 1 examined in this group originated in structural deficiencies in the mechanisms set up in Romania as of 1990 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12742
SUKRAN AYDIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
SUKRAN AYDIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference on account of the applicants conviction for having spoken Kurdish during election campaigns in 2002 2004 and 2007 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37340
THERAPIC CENTER S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. Italy
THERAPIC CENTER S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 04/10/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: The case concerns the non execution or the excessive delay in the execution of enforcement judicial orders decreti ingiuntivi by the local health EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50391
TRGO v. Croatia
TRGO v. Croatia HRV 11/09/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Protection of property: Refusal of domestic courts to acknowledge ownership of certain plots of land acquired ex lege by adverse possession on the basis of a provision which was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12605
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
ULGER v. Turkey
ULGER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Domestic courts refusal to transmit a copy of a favourable judgment necessary for enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37136
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the unjustified refusals of the courts between 1999 and 2015 to register associations the aim of which is to achieve the recognition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3657
UNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. Bulgaria
UNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. Bulgaria BGR 13/01/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3914
VARADINOV v. Bulgaria
VARADINOV v. Bulgaria BGR 05/01/2018 00:00:00 15/01/2018 16:40:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the inability for the applicant to challenge a penalty for a road traffic offence before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48655
VARELA GEIS v. Spain
VARELA GEIS v. Spain ESP 05/06/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in conviction to imprisonment for justification of genocide in which the Audiencia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3549
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 04/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern mainly deaths ill treatment including torture and lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention or in penitentiary facilities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3593
VLAD v. Romania
VLAD v. Romania ROU 26/02/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: 1 These cases concern the excessive length of civil Nicolau group and criminal proceedings Stoianova and Nedelcu group and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13259
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine UKR 11/07/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Vyerentsov group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to freedom of assembly violation of Article 11 . The Vyerentsov case concerns violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31279
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569