Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 161 - 180 of 364
KOM, SPOLOCNOST S RUCENÍM OBMEDZENÝM v. Slovakia
KOM SPOLOCNOST S RUCEN M OBMEDZEN M v. Slovakia SVK 02/09/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: The present case concerns a disproportionate restriction on the applicant company s right of access to a court as a result of the refusal of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58335
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia RUS 22/03/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the discrimination of the applicants military serviceman and police officers on account of different conditions for parental leave based on their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13956
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine UKR 21/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative responsibility proceedings due to the lack of adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the second EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31130
KOUTSOKOSTAS v. Greece
KOUTSOKOSTAS v. Greece GRC 13/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicants right to property on account of the domestic courts refusal to examine the applicants action seeking payment of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52753
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KUC v. Slovakia
KUC v. Slovakia SVK 02/09/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: The case concerns the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons provided by the courts when assessing if the applicant should remain in pre trial detention after the quashing of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58345
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
LACATUS v. Switzerland
LACATUS v. Switzerland CHE 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: Interference with private life: imposition of a fine in 2014 on a vulnerable Roma person for having begged followed by imprisonment for five days for non payment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57455
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary HUN 13/10/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants life sentences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10897
LEDONNE v. Italy (no. 1)
LEDONNE v. Italy no. 1 ITA 12/08/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case formerly part of a group of 163 cases concerns the excessive length of criminal proceedings violation of Article 6 1 . At its Human Rights meeting in September EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28200
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LINDSTROM AND MASSELI v. Finland
LINDSTROM AND MASSELI v. Finland FIN 14/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the forced use of sealed overalls on two prisoners while in isolation that is from 13 to 16 November and from 9 to 16 May 2004 respectively. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6008
LINGURAR v. Romania
LINGURAR v. Romania ROU 16/04/2019 00:00:00 25/04/2019 11:23:50 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate use of force against the applicants during a police raid on a Roma 1 community in 2011 an operation found by the Court to disclose EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51929
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
LOIRY v. Romania
LOIRY v. Romania ROU 17/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a final court decision of 9 August 2018 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60331
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 01/07/2014 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before civil courts and administrative bodies between 1996 and 2021. The European Court criticised in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-261
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285