Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 2001 - 2020 of 2100
WALCZAK v. Poland
WALCZAK v. Poland POL 09/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unnecessary interference due to the authorities refusal of family visits by the applicant s wife during detention. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55603
WELSH AND SILVA CANHA v. Portugal
WELSH AND SILVA CANHA v. Portugal PRT 30/08/2022 00:00:00 02/09/2022 10:09:44 Case Description: This case concerns an unjustified interference with the freedom of expression of the applicants journalists and respectively the editor and deputy editor of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61009
WENNER v. Germany
WENNER v. Germany DEU 01/12/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 17:05:58 Case Description: Failure of the respondent state to ensure that the health of the applicant a long term heroin addict without any realistic chance of overcoming addiction and having received EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45805
WERRA NATURSTEIN GMBH & CO KG v. Germany
WERRA NATURSTEIN GMBH CO KG v. Germany DEU 19/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Violation of the right to protection of property on account of the total lack of compensation as regards the applicant company s mining licence and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46759
WILKINSON AND ALLAN v. the United Kingdom
WILKINSON AND ALLAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 06/02/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before a court martial due to its failing independence and impartiality. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2504
WILLE v. Liechtenstein
WILLE v. Liechtenstein LIE 28/10/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:30:30 Case Description: Les notes ne sont disponibles qu en anglais. Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just satisfaction for non pecuniary damage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-79
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979
WISSE v. France
WISSE v. France FRA 20/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the recording of remand detainees conversations with their relatives in detention centres visiting rooms. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33245
WITKOWSKI v. Poland
WITKOWSKI v. Poland POL 13/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the applicant s inability to appeal against a judgment given against him by the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51865
WLOCH v. Poland
WLOCH v. Poland POL 22/01/2001 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Unlawful detention lack of adversarial principle in the review proceedings and excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17769
X AND OTHERS v. Albania
X AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 31/08/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: The case concerns failure of the authorities to implement swift and comprehensive desegregation measures in an elementary school the Naim Frash ri elementary school in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61097
X AND Y v. Croatia
X AND Y v. Croatia HRV 03/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Denial of a fair hearing due to lack of procedural safeguards in proceedings divesting the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10109
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Poland
X v. Poland POL 28/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: Refusal to grant applicant full parental rights and custody over her youngest child in 2009 based solely or decisively on considerations regarding her sexual orientation violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59871
X v. Sweden
X v. Sweden SWE 09/04/2018 00:00:00 02/05/2018 10:26:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation ordered by the Migration Agency and confirmed by the Migration Court to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49349
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569