Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1581 - 1600 of 2100
ROWE AND DAVIS v. the United Kingdom
ROWE AND DAVIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/02/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to non disclosure by prosecution of relevant evidence on the ground of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2480
ROZSA v. Hungary
ROZSA v. Hungary HUN 28/07/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court s decisions resulting in the applicants inability to seek compensation in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10501
RTBF v. Belgium
RTBF v. Belgium BEL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the lack of a predictable legal framework as well as clear and constant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1209
RUBINS v. Latvia
RUBINS v. Latvia LVA 01/06/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the dismissal by the domestic courts in the context of a labour dispute of a professor s appeal against the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12700
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 11/10/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: Right to liberty functioning of justice: Unlawful administrative detention without a court order and excessively lengthy detention on remand unfair criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33465
RUIANU v. Romania
RUIANU v. Romania ROU 17/09/2003 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure to execute final and enforceable court decisions due to various deficiencies in regarding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13077
RUMPF v. Germany
RUMPF v. Germany DEU 02/12/2010 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of an effective remedy against the length of judicial proceedings before civil courts labour courts administrative courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38468
RUOTSALAINEN v. Finland
RUOTSALAINEN v. Finland FIN 16/09/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Violation of the right not to be punished twice as the applicant found to be driving with more leniently taxed fuel than the diesel oil his van should have been running EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5972
RUPA AND TOMPI v. Romania
RUPA AND TOMPI v. Romania ROU 02/05/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to provide pertinent and sufficient reasons to justify extending the 15 years old first applicant s pre trial detention. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46753
RUSISHVILI v. Georgia
RUSISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 30/09/2022 00:00:00 18/10/2022 14:54:25 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial on account of the lack of sufficient reasoning in the domestic court s decision of 2012 dismissing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61453
RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS v. Russia
RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Electoral rights protection of property functioning of justice and lack of remedy: Disproportionate and unlawful refusal of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13549
RUTAR AND RUTAR MARKETING D.O.O. v. Slovenia
RUTAR AND RUTAR MARKETING D.O.O. v. Slovenia SVN 15/03/2023 00:00:00 27/03/2023 08:53:55 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the applicants right to a fair trial due to the domestic courts failure in 2019 to reason their refusal to accede EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62951
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands NLD 24/10/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to render the decision to prolong the applicant s confinement to a secure institution within the time limit provided for by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4477
RYABOV v. Russia
RYABOV v. Russia RUS 07/07/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Interference with the exercise of the applicant s right of individual petition through the police inquiry initiated against his lawyer violation of Art. 34 . Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13789
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia RUS 07/07/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of public access to the reasoning of judicial decisions in civil and criminal matters between 2001 and 2009 as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13659
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 20/01/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns an unlawful and disproportionate interference with the applicant s property rights because of the impossibility to obtain in kind the plot of land granted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31598
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/09/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Automatic pre trial detention under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and the lack of availability of an enforceable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2568
S.C. ANTARES TRANSPORT S.A. AND S.C. TRANSROBY S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. ANTARES TRANSPORT S.A. AND S.C. TRANSROBY S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 15/03/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns the withdrawal in 2006 without compensation of six licences to operate public transport services on a group of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13113
S.C. BRITANIC WORLD S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. BRITANIC WORLD S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 12/09/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of legal certainty on account of the revision of a final county court judgment by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12718
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania ROU 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions of the applicant a privatised company as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52979